Depends if you call leaders negotiating democracy. That's the part of what the EU does that the leavers are complaining about being anti democratic. The EU combines this with direct democracy to prevent things getting pushed through by unelected ruling classes. Either method I call more democratic than countries acting without consultation with others whom its actions affect.
The problem is with simply having nations representatives negotiate on equal terms is that you are effectively saying that an Indian person has 1/20th of the voice of a British person in those negotiations.
That doesn't mean it's not the best way for independent nations to negotiate but the system is unbalanced and not particularly democratic.
Putting the EU up against India at least brings the disparity down to 2 - 1 and we have much more similar ideals with the EU than India.
But if you want us to have a load of poorer nations to exploit then it's certainly better than having the EU with its democratic institutions and court that protects its citizens and buisnesses rights.
Why would we or anyone else want to exploit them...if you mean by that to get the right price etc why would we be exploiting them. Do we exploit the Chinese are we worried about their working practises. if we are...... why haven't we boycotted them same with other countries.
