No in actions. More companies are creating and moving management and production to local offices then to head officesIt is prevalent in words but no actions in reality.
No in actions. More companies are creating and moving management and production to local offices then to head officesIt is prevalent in words but no actions in reality.
No in actions. More companies are creating and moving management and production to local offices then to head offices
Correlation and causation look warily at each other from a great distance. I'd suggest looking at the performance of the Eurozone countries before 1999.
Very hard to look at the Eurozone before the Euro and match it up to when the euro replaced all the foreign currencies.
It was a good moment, and an opinion with which I concur. I did find it funny to think of the NIMBYs of Ayelesbury suddenly having "empathy" with us folks up north. The argument that the money should be spent improving the transport infrastructure in the North of England is a good one, but I did get the feeling the main argument was that they didn't want it so someone else could have the money. Had they wanted it the North probably wouldn't have got much of a mention - apart from the Wigan MP, of course. Lest you think I am simply resorting to sterotypes, I lived in Aylesbury once. Only for a year, as I was then released for good behaviour. My experience is that most people wouldn't have found the North with a compass!
I agree with Neville..........although Lincoln City don't have that problem anyway. Its always Saturday or Tuesday.
You must log in or register to see media
You are misreading me. I agree there is a problem. What I am talking about is that there are politicians, groups with vested interests or an agenda that take that problem and extend their scope to try and "capture" more than those that they should be helping which then ends up making it much much harder to deal with the problem they were supposed to be trying to address.
And then over time because this much larger group has constantly been told that they are part of this group then the group itself starts to believe the problem includes them and thus resentment builds because now it is such a large group.
I have long talked about this. Diluting the help that should have been focused on those that really do have the problem, no matter what the problem is, whatever subject.
I am not saying the problem itself is exaggerated. I am saying that certain groups or agendas are taking a problem but then trying to expand their target to make out more people are affected. the problem is still there. they aren't exaggerating the problem itself, they are just trying to develop more "customers / clients" because there is so much money involved or it is politically / strategically advantageous.
So both people moving into london and away from london are both bad?they are moving people to the new places. Not moving the work to the people in those places. Hurrah, we are saved because a London company has brought it's London workers to Lincoln. praise the lord, hang on, why did the house prices just go up again?
The BBC itself just did this. they moved to Salford because they were trying to tackle being so "London-centric"...........but they took their London workforce with them, and people in Salford have seen housing prices in the area suddenly go up.
Absolutely spot on SJ, couldn’t have expressed it any better. And I’m borrowing that Burke quote if you don’t mind!'Representative' Democracy. Quote by Edmund Burke :
“Your representative owes you not only his industry, but his judgement, and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion”.
Below cut and pasted from comments on a Guardian post on Facebook re the billboard campaign by Led by Donkeys (@ByDonkeys). It sums up pretty well my opinion of our parliaments handling of the referendum from concept to the situation we find ourselves in today.
For our Government to blindly follow a very small majority of those who voted, in an advisory referendum, using a hugely oversimplified question, concerning a vastly complex and far-reaching decision on our basic National Economic, Social and Security Interests, represents the exact antithesis of and massively undermines that tradition of 'Representative' Democracy.
Go right ahead it's spot on. Do have a look, if you haven't already, at the posters @ByDonkeysAbsolutely spot on SJ, couldn’t have expressed it any better. And I’m borrowing that Burke quote if you don’t mind!
What I want to know though is are we entering Eurovision this year?
i would not say fear, generally the black population from the 50,60and into the 70s commited a lower % of crimes than they do now so stayed off the police radar. if you are only .05 of the population then you kinda stand out if you are a criminal.
I have fair hair, green eyes and pink skin so i would be picked up by police over here in Colombia in a New York second if i did something stupid
You clearly don’t understand the benefits of being white and think your experience in Columbia is the same as the average black persons in the US or UK
Imps - put this in the general football thread. Not everyone looks in here and I think this would be a welcome post.