Only reason the vote is such a mess is because Spain won't allow them to do it as they see it as being illegal. If Spain allowed them to vote on independence then none of the dodgy **** or violence would have gone one. I blame the Spainish government for it all.
As I said before any region wanting to go independent should at the very least get a vote. Then see if it is viable to go ahead with it.
Listening to Jeremy Corbyn's speech today I truly think that this bloke has more than a touch of stardust about him and he has really caught the zeitgeist of the moment. I don't think that he is mistaken about the Neo-Liberalism that has dominated politics in recent years and, as opposed to coming across as a kind of left wing crackpot, what we are witnessing is the fact that the population of the UK is now wholly ready to embrace socialism. Jeremy Corbyn will emerge as the most significant politician since Margaret Thatcher and he has the potential to lead a government that will prove to be the most significant since the Second World War.
I cannot recall being some enthused by a political leader who is so sincere and genuine in what he wants to achieve. For once, here is a leader who realises that the economy is there to serve the people and not the other way around. With his vision, more people will reconnect with politics and I genuinely expect that, come the next election, he will not only sweep aside the Tories but also the Scottish Nationalists. A year ago, this would have seemed unlikely but his vision of a socialist future has captured the public imagination to the extent that anyone who is opposed to this view comes across a decidedly old-fashioned. The emergence of Tony Blair in the mid 1990s saw politics shift towards the centre ground and we are no witnessing a seismic change towards the Left which has been deeply unfashionable and discredited by many for over forty years. I think that this change is now pretty unstoppable. Corbyn offered a new vision for this country for those people unable to recall the market-led / capitalist model so espoused since the days of Thatcher and his ideas now seem hugely attractive. The election marked a sea-change in British politics and stripped of the cynicism of New Labour, there is not only a credible alternative to the Conservatives but the potential of a change for the benefit of everyone which makes the need for any alternative highly undesirable. All of a sudden May, Johnson, Hammond, Sturgeon and Cable all seemed marooned in a different era which now seems to be unpopular with the younger population.
Both are completely different. One is to stop harassment and another is to stop people voting independence. Not every rule in constitution are good rules. I can agree with one while thinking another is bad and should never be a law in the first place.
The second one might just be to stop a nationally unpopular separatist party from harassing the rest of Spain into breaking up because of internal Catalan politics. In your opinion, their view is irrelevant. Perhaps they feel like the law should be upheld.
What if it was Trump (or any President) breaking the US constitution to support LGBT rights. Would you support him? Your views on the rule of law seem pretty flexible.
Anyway, it doesn't matter whether you think a law against independence referendums should exist. It does exist. It wasn't imposed on anyone. It was adopted by referendum in 1978, overwhelmingly supported in Catalonia. It proclaims the country having "indissoluble unity". Puigdemont would be in his rights to try to get the consittuion changed but it's more populist to just hold a referendum and welcome the confrontation. And some people are being taken inby his claims of being the victim.
Vin
I had read lots of comments warbling about how Spain is different than the other problems in Europe. Where the rest of Europe's problem is a fascist nazi one yet Spain had no problem other than an internal disagreement. Then this popped up in one of my feeds:
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
John Smith, what might have been had he become PM?Both the main parties have shifted and become much more idealised. In JC's case it is much more clearly defined but quite how he carries Chuka with him, I do not know. Meanwhile the Tories seem rather lost on where they actually want to do. If I were Mrs May, I would jetison Brexit in the morning, and bring the Tories back into the bosom of European Conservatism, which is where the UK Conservative party should be positioning itself. The alternative makes it look rather like UKIP and other disparate parties on the right.
What I miss are the good old days of 1997 and the arrival of New Labour with Alan Milburn, Mo Mowlem, Peter Mandelson, Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, John Prescott, John Smith,
What is it with some elements of Conservative politicians? There seems to be absolutely no room for negotiation. With regard to Catalunya, Rajoy refused to give one inch to the idea of a referendum, unless the whole of Spain was allowed a say in the matter. This has been an ongoing issue for many years that culminated in yesterday's very unfortunate scenes.
Thatcher refused to sit down with the miners, Sinn Fein, the Argentines. Putin seems like a bullyboy with regard to his neighbours and also in terms of his internal social policy. And of course we have the deep conservatism of the Saudis where the pace of change in certain things such as great liberties to women, gays, critics of the Government is virtually non-existant. It begs the question why anyone would vote for a Conservative party anywhere that is unyielding.
Im very pro staying in Europe but i don't call Cameron a fool for allowing the vote, Just the half hearted campaign for staying in.Imagine if they did give them their referendum and they voted out. Then what? They'd be called absolute fools for allowing it (case in point Cameron, Brexit vote, surely we're staying in, whoops)
Imagine if they did give them their referendum and they voted out. Then what? They'd be called absolute fools for allowing it (case in point Cameron, Brexit vote, surely we're staying in, whoops)
Im very pro staying in Europe but i don't call Cameron a fool for allowing the vote, Just the half hearted campaign for staying in.

Some truth in this, but as the Catalan regional government was determined to go ahead with an unconstitutional referendum anyway, the national government had at least 3 options;
1) allow the referendum to go ahead and agree to meet with the Catalan authorities to agree a way forward afterwards.
2) allow the referendum to go ahead but, havimg already seen it ruled unconstitutional by the Spanish courts, resolve to ignore the results.
3) Send in the Guardia Civil (a hated remnant of Franco's old paramilitary police), close down polling stations, arrest Catalan officials, and assault protesters in full view of the world's press.
Seems to me Rajoy's government chose the worst of those options.
Whats happening in Catalonia and Scotland shows its the right call as far as i'm concerned. Can't see a way that it would have turned out better not holding the vote. as Archers said, what they've done seems by far the worst choice. They've just increased the support for independence.a lot of people do think he is a fool for placating the right wingers in order to win an election and it was 1 gamble too far. Maybe not necessarily yourself
Yeah, it was stupid to go full on police brutality. I was just responding to a question of why not give the Catalans a vote on independence. Would you take the risk that they separated as that would be an even bigger issue for Spain than us and Brexit (and apparantly we're heading for the apocalypse on our shores)
Whats happening in Catalonia and Scotland shows its the right call as far as i'm concerned. Can't see a way that it would have turned out better not holding the vote. as Archers said, what they've done seems by far the worst choice. They've just increased the support for independence.