Look what you started for the last couple of pagesMaybe we should have a religion thread. Should cause a few bust ups!
EDIT: I really don't think that would be a good idea so please don't.



Look what you started for the last couple of pagesMaybe we should have a religion thread. Should cause a few bust ups!
EDIT: I really don't think that would be a good idea so please don't.



It never ceases to amaze me how the subjects we are taught to avoid discussing with our friends as youngsters, seem to be most discussed when you are older.
Namely.......Money, religion and politics. However in family life for me, my Dad, brother and sister, were and are very religious as is my other sister to a degree. Another of my brothers like myself were constantly berated because we did not want to discuss or take part in religious services . They would not talk about Money or Politics, but religion was a free for all and the cause of many a disagreement and argument throughout......My younger brother and I would not capitulate and we were to a certain extent ostracised. So much so when the family emigrated to Australia all those years ago. I stayed........Although my younger brother did not have a choice but to go.
Over the years it still is a barrier of sorts, my youngest sister will not talk to me, my other sister still tries to convert me, we do converse on other family matters and see each other regularly. Needless to say I am closest to my younger brother.
All that heartache in the name of religion, even in families........Who the heck invented religion?? As others have said the cause of the most worldly conflicts.
It never ceases to amaze me how the subjects we are taught to avoid discussing with our friends as youngsters, seem to be most discussed when you are older.
Namely.......Money, religion and politics. However in family life for me, my Dad, brother and sister, were and are very religious as is my other sister to a degree. Another of my brothers like myself were constantly berated because we did not want to discuss or take part in religious services . They would not talk about Money or Politics, but religion was a free for all and the cause of many a disagreement and argument throughout......My younger brother and I would not capitulate and we were to a certain extent ostracised. So much so when the family emigrated to Australia all those years ago. I stayed........Although my younger brother did not have a choice but to go.
Over the years it still is a barrier of sorts, my youngest sister will not talk to me, my other sister still tries to convert me, we do converse on other family matters and see each other regularly. Needless to say I am closest to my younger brother.
All that heartache in the name of religion, even in families........Who the heck invented religion?? As others have said the cause of the most worldly conflicts.
I'm agnostic (was baptised a Catholic but never confirmed) and I'm interested in the topic of religion and belief. For me atheism (and by "atheism" I mean the active belief that there is no God; I suspect that many people who say they're atheists are actually agnostics) is just as illogical and just as much of a belief as any religious position. There's no evidence either way on the existence of God so the only logical position is agnosticism.
As for religion being the root of all evil and the idea that eliminating it will make the world a better place, I'm not sure about that. There have been a number of countries that have practised state atheism and it's generally not gone too well. A quick look at wikipedia produces the following list: the Soviet Union, Albania, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, China, Cuba, North Korea. Hmmm, not the best advert for state atheism.
As I say I'm not religious myself but I do think religion has played a very important role in creating the society we live in. Our laws have evolved out of Christian beliefs and many people still "feel" Christian somehow even if they don't practise - lots go to church at Christmas and/or Easter when they wouldn't at any other time. Another concern is also that the absence of some sort of God figure as a superior moral authority undermines any attempt to create a common morality - why should I accept your moral position is superior to mine? - and ultimately leads to the adoption of "might is right".
I've had a similar thing Beddy. My older sister became a born again, and clumsy attempts to help me see the light ensued over a number of years. I found this insulting and undermining to my integrity and intelligence. We have an utterly formal relationship, and there is an emotional distance between my sister and my parents too. It's sad on different levels.
Because they are ATHIESTS, a philosophy based on the specific disavowal of God and religion.

Look what you started for the last couple of pages![]()
Well said Whiteley, I agree entirely. When it comes to religion, whatever we might feel, other people are entitled to believe whatever they want. And this is the Politics thread after all!Yes and I was right we are better off not discussing it. A lot of people cry foul at prejudices, and quite rightly, but there are some on here sailing very close to the wind when it comes to religion. People are entitled to their beliefs and most religious people are good people. People do bad things in the name of religion but look carefully at the religions and you will see what they claim to be following is not there.
I thought this was the politics thread. Trump has been thwarted and I am smirking about that........for the moment.

I missed this response earlier. It's spot on imo. Atheism is, in effect a religion. Which explains the tendancy of some of it's proponents towards fundamentalism and an excess of dogmatic piety![]()
Indeed they are. These people are no more Christian than suicide bombers are Muslim, imo. ie., not at all.
OK, I'll rise to the bait.
I'll assume you're Christian. Presumably that means you don't believe in Shiva, Zeus or Wotan. (You're an atheist too. I'm just atheist about one more god than you.)
My lack of belief in Yahweh being a deity is identical in every respect to your lack of belief in Zeus being a deity. You may want to reread that as it exactly identifies how I feel.
Try to put yourself in the shoes of someone who thinks that. Go on, give it a go. Consider your feelings about Zeus not being a deity. It's not hard, is it? It doesn't require a world view, structure or dogma not to believe in Zeus. You don't need a book or any of the trappings of a religion not to believe in Zeus. You can do it just with the power of your mind. No evidence, no belief. You don't need a creed or someone to tell you how not to believe in Zeus.
Hopefully then you'll see just how daft it is to call atheism a religion.
Vin
I am a atheist. But I wouldn't give a **** if a person worships Mr Blobby. As long as a person respects and treats others as a human being I have no problem if they are religious or not. The problem is many people sadly use religion as a way to spew hate speech at others ( such as lgbt+ etc).Most of your assumptions in the first paragraph are wrong.
The main difference between you and I on this subject appears to be your absolute insistance that you are right and anyone with a different set of beliefs is wrong; an attitude typically exhibited either by religious zealots or, er, atheists.
Which brings me back to my original point; atheism often manifests as a form of thinking similar in many ways to religious fundamentalism. Hence the intolerance for other belief systems.