We finally reaching the point on this thread where people are just going to start calling people they disagree with Nonce defenders?
He posted it as a response to Chilco's post and wrote "you" liberals and lefties clearly including him in his assertion. The ban is justified imo.Not that you're going listen to me but that is not a personal insult. You are moving the goalposts to justify the ban. His reply to you personally was about deflecting the question. He then followed it up with a general question. You might not like the question but it wasn't aimed at you personally. People on here have called Conservatives voters ****s, does that mean everyone who voted Conservative should take it as a personal insult?
It wasn't until Chilcs posted that he voted Lib Dem that liberals was added to Os's "defend rapists and ****s?" rant making it personal as well as being well over the top. That's my take on it, I'll leave it at that.'Not that you're going listen to me but that is not a personal insult. You are moving the goalposts to justify the ban. His reply to you personally was about deflecting the question. He then followed it up with a general question. You might not like the question but it wasn't aimed at you personally. People on here have called Conservatives voters ****s, does that mean everyone who voted Conservative should take it as a personal insult?
It got a well deserved ban for the poster.We finally reaching the point on this thread where people are just going to start calling people they disagree with Nonce defenders?
Another good, long opinion piece on the bond markets this morning from the silent media, saying Reeves has nowhere to go with this.
Bond crisis leaves Rachel Reeves with nowhere to go https://www.thetimes.com/article/7f78af6c-6462-4ca5-9204-05049d4eee15?shareToken=57262211e8e400b9d788693bb62adb47
He posted it as a response to Chilco's post and wrote "you" liberals and lefties clearly including him in his assertion. The ban is justified imo.
I'd like to discuss why I think you are wrong or even make a harmless joke with you but in the current climate someone will call for a ban. This is the stage we are at on this thread now, dobbing each other in. I'm well aware that Os himself did this yesterday about loading but I don't like it wherever it comes from.
I will only contribute by posting and will try to avoid any interaction with the other posters on here so that's one objective reached.
As for Osvaldorama's ban, it appears the end result justifies the means.
Apart from the fact that we had an inquiry, the report on which was published in 2022, and from which the last government failed to implement any recommendations.You must log in or register to see media
Apart from the fact that we had an inquiry, the report on which was published in 2022, and from which the last government failed to implement any recommendations.
https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports-recommendations/publications/inquiry/final-report.html
Please stop spreading these lies.
No, that’s not correct. They accepted 21 of the 22 but failed to implement any of them.I was told today that they implemented 21 of the 22 recommendations? And only didn’t on only one…..not fact checked yet as still at work.
Massive difference from what Richie was lead to believe.No, that’s not correct. They accepted 21 of the 22 but failed to implement any of them.
It’s almost there is a massive campaign of misinformation going on.Massive difference from what Richie was lead to believe.
Massive difference from what Richie was lead to believe.