Please join the Trust...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Can someone from the Trust contact Steve Garton on 07952626273 please ? He is wanting to buy one of the retro shirts and doesn't have access to the internet. Thank you.
 
I can see both sides of the argument, but on balance I would personally side by the option of asking the club if they would agree to the trust to be allowed back into these meetings.

GB IMO is a good person to have at the helm. I accept that there was an error of judgement with scarfgate, but at the time the Allam's accepted it as a lighthearted joke, as in reality all is said was "Allam out" confirming what they had said themselves already. It was only after a few weeks that they started to use that as a reason to create a rift, which at the time suited their purpose
 
  • Like
Reactions: balkan tiger
John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. said:
I can see both sides of the argument, but on balance I would personally side by the option of asking the club if they would agree to the trust to be allowed back into these meetings.

GB IMO is a good person to have at the helm. I accept that there was an error of judgement with scarfgate, but at the time the Allam's accepted it as a lighthearted joke, as in reality all is said was "Allam out" confirming what they had said themselves already. It was only after a few weeks that they started to use that as a reason to create a rift, which at the time suited their purpose
Click to expand...
I disagree john it was bloody stupid thing for him to do, was that his ego?
Before that I thought he had been excellent.
 
John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. said:
I can see both sides of the argument, but on balance I would personally side by the option of asking the club if they would agree to the trust to be allowed back into these meetings.

GB IMO is a good person to have at the helm. I accept that there was an error of judgement with scarfgate, but at the time the Allam's accepted it as a lighthearted joke, as in reality all is said was "Allam out" confirming what they had said themselves already. It was only after a few weeks that they started to use that as a reason to create a rift, which at the time suited their purpose
Click to expand...
Chazz Rheinhold said:
I disagree john it was bloody stupid thing for him to do, was that his ego?
Before that I thought he had been excellent.
Click to expand...

Didn't he give the scarf on behalf of someone / some group who couldn't be at the meeting? Some irony there if that's the case.
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
I disagree john it was bloody stupid thing for him to do, was that his ego?
Before that I thought he had been excellent.
Click to expand...
balkan tiger said:
Didn't he give the scarf on behalf of someone / some group who couldn't be at the meeting? Some irony there if that's the case.
Click to expand...

As Balkan says he was delivering on behalf of that protest group who were not invited to the meeting. I agree it was of poor judgement, but certainly feel that it wasn't a problem for the Allam's until they bought it up as an issue when it suited their agenda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: balkan tiger
John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. said:
As Balkan says he was delivering on behalf of that protest group who were not invited to the meeting. I agree it was of poor judgement, but certainly feel that it wasn't a problem for the Allam's until they bought it up as an issue when it suited their agenda.
Click to expand...
It was an insult John and it shouldn’t have been done
We all know they’re thin skinned anyway
No idea who the two rebels are??
 
  • Like
Reactions: SW3 Chelsea Tiger and balkan tiger
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back