Based on the fact that for years now, money has been spunked on a playing surface that during and post winter is not fit for purpose and that money could be better used elsewhere, plus the fact that it seems part of the problem is the stadium needing turning 90 degrees to help with the problem.... plus the fact that it doesnt allow us perhaps to be as creative at home as we are away on better surfaces (sorry long sentence) ....
I'm just watching Livingstone v Rangers, ive actually watched a couple of their games lately... and their astro turf looks like a very fair surface. Now if they bought a cheaper version based on available funds and we bought a better version would that be sacrilege. Would it allow for better football. Would 'we' then have the advantage of playing on it regularly at home ](better home results) and would it mean less injuries...?
I'm just watching Livingstone v Rangers, ive actually watched a couple of their games lately... and their astro turf looks like a very fair surface. Now if they bought a cheaper version based on available funds and we bought a better version would that be sacrilege. Would it allow for better football. Would 'we' then have the advantage of playing on it regularly at home ](better home results) and would it mean less injuries...?
Last edited: