Certainly not happy with the decision and I'm sure many people will agree. There's a reason why yesterday's atmosphere was so poor.
We were 16th when he took over, with all of his changes and different style of play it lead to the dizzying heights of 17th. The fact he is now going to be in charge of transfers really worries me. Of all of the people he brought in only Hewitt and Mousinho did themselves justice. As for Daniels, Pigott, Innis, Marriott and Smith we were better off with what we already had. Worrying times ahead.
The Gills Peg Leg - I agree with you. I have stated that i will give PT my natural support next season but i cannot for the life of me accept that PT did a better job than MA, because in my eyes he didn't. Simply because there can be no measure other than to say Peter Taylor has kept us in L1.
But some people throughout social media outlets seem to contradict themselves. They will say it was MA's squad, so surely that means that Martin Allen's squad kept us up then! Whereas i think to the contrary, Taylor made changes and failed to improve. Noting i used the word improved, rather than achieve. Unless you rightly count achieving as maintaining L1 status. But as you have pointed out TGPL, when the current manager took over we were 16th but we finished 17th, so MadDog was the achiever of the higher position and after only ten games, whereas the latter was done after 36, so nothing improved and a lesser position was placed.
When the season started everyone was saying how difficult our start to the season was...ok, let's forget Colchester, it happened. Then look at his next three games, Wolves (convincing Champions) - Brentford (auto promoted) - Swindon (vying for playoffs). Not the easiest start by any stretch of the imagination, enough to demoralise any team.
Imagine then, the big boss man turning up at Shrewsbury, having not spoken to the incoming manager - huh!
So in he comes and what happens, Brackley, must be MA's fault, what happens next Rotherham and Notts County, must be MA's fault, then Leyton Orient, our worst humiliating defeat since the days of Stimmo, must have been MA's fault.
MA spent all the budget, so that didn't help PT...whoooaa...hang on a minute, what budget did the snarling man spend?...he brought in Cody, you all wanted him, he brought in Bayo...players player of the year...he brought in Nelson, England's number one. Seems a sound use of budget to me. So what did happen to the pennies from Gazza, Payne and the rest as the crazy one brought in all the other freebies?
There is some things i blame Allen for but not the excuses that are being thrown.
So who did Peter Taylor bring in, PIGGOTT, excuse me while i roll over laughing. Yeah, Innis was ok, you can't fault injury but you can question Davies' departure on loan.
I've never been a supporter of the merry-go-round of management and players, working with old friends has its obstacles, like a manager that works with experienced players but sticks with them despite conceding 79 goals, only Crewe had a worst record.
What was behind MA's departure, I saw rumours of a players revolt, well some disagreement might be a more pleasing word(s). But all players have disagreement's don't they at some point, just ask Whelps and Martin, just shake hands and put a sticky plaster over it and all will be well, won't it?
Personally I see some departures and you might be surprised at the names. You also might not care, hence we'll give Peter Taylor a clean slate and a fair crack of the whip, at least he got a fair two year contract straight up, unlike the departed, what was it one year and then an added ten games, i forget how that contract worked, enlighten me.
Good luck Peter Taylor because your sure going to need it, because those two years will peak with a year left of the five year plan. In readiness for the new ground, wake me up someone, I must be dreaming, either that or disillusioned at what I thought was meant to be. But then the communication out of Priestfield has never been the best.