The agony and ecstasy of penalties is all part and parcel of the beautiful game IMO.Do it like boxing, a points system, 5 refs judge both teams put up the name of the best team and a camera shows each one and the most voted wins the match, and after 90 mins no extra time, because nobody wants to go through that again. That is one idea any better ?.
Do it like boxing, a points system, 5 refs judge both teams put up the name of the best team and a camera shows each one and the most voted wins the match, and after 90 mins no extra time, because nobody wants to go through that again. That is one idea any better ones ?.
Years ago a supporter came up with this idea, put it to the football authorities but they all ignored him . Personally I think it would be better than what we have now.
If level at 90 , immediately take the penalty shoot out. Whoever wins it gets awarded half a goal . Then play 30 mins , guaranteeing that someone wins by a “ goal” score rather than a penalty count
Sounds convoluted to me. Really don't like the idea of a half goal. Just a bit weird.
I'm not sure what's wrong with penalties. It's heartbreaking, but that's losing a game of football.
Why did the golden goal system fail?there is no real alternative, flipping a coin has been tried, golden goal has been tried...at least penalties keeps the 'football' element, requires skill and concentration and allows teams a mistake or two...yep, it is a horrible way to lose or even decide a game but i think it is the best and fairest way.
For me , I’d just prefer the feel of it being decided in the end by actually playing, with all players being involved. Probably only perfect solution is to have replays - which of course cannot happen in tournaments
iirc instead of having two teams going for it to get that golden goal it ended up with both teams ****ting themselves in case they made a mistake leading to a goal and the extra time became a stalemate.Why did the golden goal system fail?
Years ago a supporter came up with this idea, put it to the football authorities but they all ignored him . Personally I think it would be better than what we have now.
If level at 90 , immediately take the penalty shoot out. Whoever wins it gets awarded half a goal . Then play 30 mins , guaranteeing that someone wins by a “ goal” score rather than a penalty count
That's a canny idea. How about if you have the shootout after full time (and get it done a bit quicker because there's less drama), then play the 30 minutes and only fall back on the penalty winners to decide it if nobody scores in extra time. If they do then the penalty results are void.
Does that not also create a bizarre dynamic encouraging a team to play anti football knowing they have already won on penalties?
Just doesn't sound like football to me.
If one team tries to sit back for thirty minutes and let the other team attack them at will it'd most likely end badly for them, seen it happen often enough in the regular 90.
I take your point but imo a penalty shootout is also a bit of an unnatural and bizarre way to decide a tournament and heaps blame and, unfortunately, hate on individuals who should be getting praised for having the balls to step up. If there was a way to end it by playing football it'd be better.