Pelle or Long

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Pelle or Long?


  • Total voters
    20
Long now has the perfect opportunity to show what he can do, over the next few games.
He should have taken the match ball home with him, yesterday, but he scored when we needed him to.
I might be wrong, but I think, because of his pace, many managers see him as being a support striker, rather than the main man, which has reduced his goals scored stats.
Again, I might be wrong, but I think his one season for Reading, as their main striker, he scored 21/22 goals. Regular time, down the middle, could be just what he needs to step up a notch.
 
I think that yesterday proves that formations, tactics and substitutions aren't the be all and end all. We won the midfield battle, meaning there was less pressure on our back four and more opportunities for the attackers.

It proves that hard work beats talent, if talent doesn't work hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saintharry13
How many posts have there been complaining about Martina, and now after one game he's the starting RB?

Just calm down and let Koeman pick the side. He's awfully good at it.
I have to disagree with your last sentence. If he was awfully good at it he would have got it right the vast majority of the time. He got it right last night but his hand was forced by injuries. He's generally good at picking sides but he should have put Long in for Pelle sooner rather than risk aggravating his injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tintin
How many posts have there been complaining about Martina, and now after one game he's the starting RB?

Just calm down and let Koeman pick the side. He's awfully good at it.

If a player plays well he deserves to keep his place in my view. I'm incredibly consistent on this. I've always said this about any player.

The second part is nonsense..
 
I have to disagree with your last sentence. If he was awfully good at it he would have got it right the vast majority of the time. He got it right last night but his hand was forced by injuries. He's generally good at picking sides but he should have put Long in for Pelle sooner rather than risk aggravating his injury.

Exactly. Some of the logic on here defies belief <doh>

Apparently whenever we win Koeman is a master tactician and master of team selection. He gets all the credit for wins, but isn't allowed to be criticised when we lose! <laugh>
 
Exactly. Some of the logic on here defies belief <doh>

Apparently whenever we win Koeman is a master tactician and master of team selection. He gets all the credit for wins, but isn't allowed to be criticised when we lose! <laugh>

When we lose you state he's stubborn and has no idea. You post far more when we lose than when we win. I find this very odd. You then take a day off when someone shows your contradictions.

There's criticism and there's non-stop moaning.
 
When we lose you state he's stubborn and has no idea. You post far more when we lose than when we win. I find this very odd. You then take a day off when someone shows your contradictions.

There's criticism and there's non-stop moaning.

Turns out that Gaston, Reed and Gazza shouldn't be in the team now.

Strange how one result suddenly changes that.