Off Topic Paris (again)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you saying that incomprehensible, badly written stuff is alright but pointing out someone has posted statements which make no sense or can have more than one interpretation are alright?

Castro, no matter how much you value your point, it is redundant in this terrible circumstance. Leave it out, mate. <ok>
 
What does "closing the borders" mean?
I would have thought it meant not allowing people in or out.
This doesn't seem practical.
I would have thought that people were being checked when trying to cross the border.
 
If you actually read about the situation rather than go about screaming for genocide you might have an idea of what the truth is.

stop being a dumb ****

tell me how many muslim communities don't have radicalised people?

tell me
 
stop being a dumb ****

tell me how many muslim communities don't have radicalised people?

tell me

I can't for the sole reason being that is an unknown number that cannot be proved. It certainly isn't as high as you will undoubtedly claim.

If you actually ****ing did some research once in a while you'd know that ISIS stand for everything Islam doesn't. Muslim scholars from all over the World have condemned ISIS and their actions, one of the reasons being that they are using Islam for their own ends despite the fact they are going against that faith itself.

Go educate yourself when you awaken from your drunken stupor, you prat. Goodnight.
 
Castro, no matter how much you value your point, it is redundant in this terrible circumstance. Leave it out, mate. <ok>

I only wanted to be able to answer him. But to do that you must be able to have the question phrased properly and not ambigiously.

Like the story of the naval officer who was up for promotion and whose commanding officer wrote " A good officer who has been known to return on board drunk". He went to see him and complained about the use of the word drunk as it was prejudicial. The commanding officer said fair enough, I will have it retyped. He did and the new one read " A good officer who has been known to return on board sober".
 
We aren't dealing with rational people here.

This is a huge error of judgment. They may not be rational by your standards, but believe me, they are supremely rational to their code of life. Understand your enemy is the best advice I can give you.
 
I only wanted to be able to answer him. But to do that you must be able to have the question phrased properly and not ambigiously.

Like the story of the naval officer who was up for promotion and whose commanding officer wrote " A good officer who has been known to return on board drunk". He went to see him and complained about the use of the word drunk as it was prejudicial. The commanding officer said fair enough, I will have it retyped. He did and the new one read " A good officer who has been known to return on board sober".

religion gives people an excuse to do bad things, and normally these people take these texts at their most fundamental values

you can cherry pick all you want, good or bad, but these people take it word for word,
so when people commit the acts they do, they sincerely believe they are going to heaven for it,
so aslong as people read these books, people will always be lured into radicalism and these acts will always come round,
therefore if these acts are inevitable, the only solution is to ban it entirely



so when you liberal scum, aren't abhorrent for their behaviour.. what hope do we have?
the blood is on YOU, who won't accept the truth
 
I've always been of the view that the west needs to be the policeman of the world. They should try to educate countries when they step over any certain lines which need to be discussed and decided. Responses should range from talking to the leaders of countries, through to sanctions and finally invasion. I would think that prolonged sanctions would be sufficient if all other countries complied with the sanctions requests. If they didn't comply they should suffer similar sanctions.
The alternative would be to tell these countries we don't like what they are doing and them ignoring us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrAdY
I only wanted to be able to answer him. But to do that you must be able to have the question phrased properly and not ambigiously.

Like the story of the naval officer who was up for promotion and whose commanding officer wrote " A good officer who has been known to return on board drunk". He went to see him and complained about the use of the word drunk as it was prejudicial. The commanding officer said fair enough, I will have it retyped. He did and the new one read " A good officer who has been known to return on board sober".

Be sober tonight. <ok>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.