I love Farage's line to the questions - what's wrong with living next to Romanians... 'you know what's wrong'......... what is so wrong?
This is proper old skool politics. Thank Goodness for Nigel to spark some contention on otherwise wet drab.
Reminds me of the virtue of welcoming from another island race Japan....
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/32788ff0-ea00-11e3-99ed-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3RyonneRB - and I quote form the FT and their PM......
On a recent television programme, Shinzo Abe was asked about one of Japan’s most politically delicate topics: immigration. Given that the population is shrinking and fewer than 2 per cent of residents are foreign, was it time for the country to throw open its doors?
The prime minister’s answer could hardly have been clearer – or more disheartening for advocates of a radical new embrace of outsiders.
“In countries that have accepted immigration, there has been a lot of friction, a lot of unhappiness both for the newcomers and the people who already lived there,” he told the audience, as he held up a white signboard marked with a red “x” to underscore his negative position on the issue.
Aside from neighbouring South Korea, no wealthy country has combined a low birth rate and tight immigration controls the way
Japan has. The country’s labour force began to shrink in the mid-1990s, and the total population peaked in 2008, at just under 130m. If nothing changes, there will be 30m fewer Japanese by 2050, and by the early 2100s – admittedly a distant extrapolation – the population could be half or even a third what it is today.
Mr Abe’s televised rejection of immigration might have surprised people who have listened to his speeches on reviving economic growth, which are full of pledges to attract international capital of both the financial and human kind.
The premier does, in fact, favour expanding some targeted programmes for importing foreign labour. He wants more outsiders to fill low-wage
jobs where shortages are acute – from construction workers to nannies