Overall debt reduced

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
no mate actual he managed it by cutting loads of running costs and a rate reduction from the council , the story comes from a local paper the Shields gazette i think
 
This was talked about in the most recent podcast. SD, not the group, had to show that he had access to £50 million when took over the club. That requirement then fell to £25 million, and subsequently lower than this even. That 72 minute podcast was very illuminating, discussing finances, current and future, the january window, losing maja and replacing him.
 
no mate actual he managed it by cutting loads of running costs and a rate reduction from the council , the story comes from a local paper the Shields gazette i think
But he took the club on debt free 6 months ago.how on earth can we build that much debt and the cut it in half with out a shrewd of published financial information in the meantime? Sound like complete bs to me mate

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
 
This was talked about in the most recent podcast. SD, not the group, had to show that he had access to £50 million when took over the club. That requirement then fell to £25 million, and subsequently lower than this even. That 72 minute podcast was very illuminating, discussing finances, current and future, the january window, losing maja and replacing him.
So nowt to do with debt then? All to do with the efl agreement of keeping finances in line, so he's reduced running cost to the point he needs less surplus?

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
 
So nowt to do with debt then? All to do with the efl agreement of keeping finances in line, so he's reduced running cost to the point he needs less surplus?

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
If I remember right
50m running costs when he took over, 11m in revenue.

Now 25m running costs, and increased revenue (don't think actual revenue was stated, let's say 15m), so he only has to prove he can cover the 10m difference. I think.
 
But he took the club on debt free 6 months ago.how on earth can we build that much debt and the cut it in half with out a shrewd of published financial information in the meantime? Sound like complete bs to me mate

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
It was only the money owed to the banks that were written off.. Other debts were still outstanding..
 
Still had to pay of some Ellis debt and there was a bunch of transfer fees outstanding, wasn't there? Stewie doing a decent job and we're bloody lucky to have him. He'll get his when the club goes up the leagues and the money starts rolling in, but by then he'll have bloody earned it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
But he took the club on debt free 6 months ago.how on earth can we build that much debt and the cut it in half with out a shrewd of published financial information in the meantime? Sound like complete bs to me mate

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

You're his Champion....
 
Last edited: