Ot ****!

Dangerously Delicious said:
Ok, well I had my new away shirt on when I nipped out to the local 24hr shop last week and got 'Disgusting!' yelled at me, not sure what the comment was aimed at shirt or team.
Click to expand...

Well yes you will get comments from people who don't like your team but the scarf experiment was a young man acting out a situation were he collapsed to see if people would stop and help - they didn't. As Tobes implied, that's a human decency fail.
 
liverpoolfool said:
For ****s sake, it was a couple of dogs, that's all.

I live on a sheep farm and dogs are treated the same as foxes and other pests, if they are running round lose they are culled. Its the farmers living, versus some dozy cow who lost her dogs.

If the dogs had got out and attacked a kid, would you all feel sorry for the little doggies then.
Click to expand...

You ****tard.

1) The dogs didn't attack and kill children.

2) They didn't attack any sheep.

3) If they did he wouldn't have had to hide the bodies.

4) By your logic, as he makes his living from it, had a lost child wandered onto his land (or even been entrusted to him for his safekeeping by a passer-by who'd found them) he has the right to kill them as they may have - not infact actually had - 'worried' his sheep.

The sooner we leave the EU and cut off the ludicrous subsidies that keep these lowlives existing the ****ing better.
 
liverpoolfool said:
its quite difficult to hit a moving target with a bolt gun dickhead
Click to expand...

Which totally negates the argument that they were in any way shape or form a danger to his livestock, nor had they been according to any of the evidence presented to the court. They were ****ing tied up, DICKHEAD!
 
Foredeckdave said:
I don't hate animals. I DO hate the stupid humans who attempt to make them equal to humans and give them the same legal rights as humans. I also hate the humans who abuse animals and cause them unnecessary cruelty and pain. That's the end of the hate for me.

I really don't like horses. I think of them as stupid over-pampered creatures. It annoys me when jockies and trainers say that a horse is very intelligent. Well any animal that allows you to jump on its back and carry you wherever you want even if it doesn't want to go there is bloody thick if you ask me! There's not much wrong with dogs. It's their owners who make them vicious or obnoxious.



As for fundamental beliefs. I have a hard enough time using a written code of beliefs and interpreting them. But I see that this space is a football forum where language and interchange have different limits to those we may use outside. If what or how I say things truly upsets then please feel free to say so either directly or via a PM - perhaps PM is better as dialogue between 2 people is more likely to achieve a viable outcome.
Click to expand...

Stick to the point. Do you think any human being has the right to tie two dogs to a post and kill them, knowing full well he'd been handed them for safekeeping, and then to hide their bodies, lie that he'd ever seen them, then come up with a cock and bull story that they had molested his sheep even when there was not one iota of evidence to support this? He has this right because he's a farmer? Even the police don't have this right.

Your (irrelevant) philosophical musings aside, the place of dogs, or indeed pets, in our society is not the point. He broke the law has been, for reasons that cry out to be fully investigated, treated with corrupt and amazing leniency by a judicial system that indulges these ****s.
 
donga darko said:
Which totally negates the argument that they were in any way shape or form a danger to his livestock, nor had they been according to any of the evidence presented to the court. They were ****ing tied up, DICKHEAD!
Click to expand...


**** you knobhead, sit in your armchair with your dick in your hand spouting ****e.

He killed a couple of dogs, that's all, no major crimes where committed here. He didn't torture them.
Things are a bit different in the countryside especially on a farm, where dogs are seen as working animals or pests. If the women had managed to keep control of the animals in the first place, their would be no issue. Or because she's blond with decent tits should she not bare any responsibility.

I hate this ****, dogs are somehow special.

Next time you tuck into your bacon butty, have a think ifthe pig deserved to die.
 
liverpoolfool said:
**** you knobhead, sit in your armchair with your dick in your hand spouting ****e.

He killed a couple of dogs, that's all, no major crimes where committed here. He didn't torture them.
Things are a bit different in the countryside especially on a farm, where dogs are seen as working animals or pests. If the women had managed to keep control of the animals in the first place, their would be no issue. Or because she's blond with decent tits should she not bare any responsibility.

I hate this ****, dogs are somehow special.

Next time you tuck into your bacon butty, have a think ifthe pig deserved to die.
Click to expand...

Wrong, I live in the sticks and have 2 friends who own working farms and like I say, you're wrong <ok>

The crime committed here is the killing of a families pet, but you know that dont you and just looking for a rise

I dont know where you get off with all these insults to be honest
 
liverpoolfool said:
**** you knobhead, sit in your armchair with your dick in your hand spouting ****e.

He killed a couple of dogs, that's all, no major crimes where committed here. He didn't torture them.
Things are a bit different in the countryside especially on a farm, where dogs are seen as working animals or pests. If the women had managed to keep control of the animals in the first place, their would be no issue. Or because she's blond with decent tits should she not bare any responsibility.

I hate this ****, dogs are somehow special.

Next time you tuck into your bacon butty, have a think ifthe pig deserved to die.
Click to expand...

All life is 'special', and just because you own a field doesn't give you any more right to break the law (or be treated favourably when you do) than anyone else. So, because this flat-capped sheepshagger provides food, he has the right to treat wildlife and domestic animals in any way he sees fit? Even if he did, WHY DID HE LIE ABOUT IT CONTINUOUSLY AS TO WHY, WHEN AND WHERE HE TOOK HIS 'JUSTIFIABLE' actions?

As for the food supply emotional blackmail, don't try that. thirty years ago miners were convinced that because they supplied the lion's share of our energy they were indispensable. Bow mama were all consumers now - which means that we should find out what supermarkets and shops he supplies and make a ****ing informed choice/boycott of the this ****s 'bacon butties'. You think of that in between turking your sister and mutilating animals because it's your 'right'.
 
Dave,

Do you class humans 'stupid' who do their best to look after endangered species? They want certain rights for them, like Elephants, Rhinos not to be killed for their tusks or Dolphins, Whales, Sharks not to be slaughtered for medicine that doesnt do anything

Tigers? Gorillas?

Do you think its stupid for a human to not want to live in a world where these beautiful animals dont exist?

For these type of things there needs to be laws on stopping the barbaric slaughtering and poaching etc. That isnt stupid mate

Horses are not stupid either. Where you get the idea they take you somewhere if they dont want too?
 
donga darko said:
Stick to the point. Do you think any human being has the right to tie two dogs to a post and kill them, knowing full well he'd been handed them for safekeeping, and then to hide their bodies, lie that he'd ever seen them, then come up with a cock and bull story that they had molested his sheep even when there was not one iota of evidence to support this? He has this right because he's a farmer? Even the police don't have this right.

Your (irrelevant) philosophical musings aside, the place of dogs, or indeed pets, in our society is not the point. He broke the law has been, for reasons that cry out to be fully investigated, treated with corrupt and amazing leniency by a judicial system that indulges these ****s.
Click to expand...

Bog Off you drongo!! Who's philosophical musing are irrelevant ? Well maybe they are when put alongside your rantings.

I don't give a **** if he shot the dogs because he was angry. Blame the bloody owner for not keeping them under control. As far as I am concerned a dog is merely an animal - nothing more and nothing less. If you want to make one them into a pet well so be it but you take responsibility for it and don't expect others other people to feel about the animal as you do.

The majority of your post on this thread are typical of the doggy crap non-dog people have to pout up with. Crap on the streets left there by uncaring anti-social owners, and crap about them being man's best friend.
 
The DR says said:
Dave,

Do you class humans 'stupid' who do their best to look after endangered species? They want certain rights for them, like Elephants, Rhinos not to be killed for their tusks or Dolphins, Whales, Sharks not to be slaughtered for medicine that doesnt do anything

Tigers? Gorillas?

Do you think its stupid for a human to not want to live in a world where these beautiful animals dont exist?

For these type of things there needs to be laws on stopping the barbaric slaughtering and poaching etc. That isnt stupid mate

Horses are not stupid either. Where you get the idea they take you somewhere if they dont want too?
Click to expand...

Don't tell me that animals have the same level of rights as human beings. Don't tell me that it's justified for animal activists to blow people up because they don't agree with them. Don't tell me that its right that whole neighbourhoods are terrorised by savage dogs or children attack by pit bull-like dogs. Or that a child is terrified in the park because a dog runs at the them and jumps up at them whilst the owner says "Oh it's OK he's just excitable and won't bite". Well no it bloody well isn't!!!

If you want to protect endangered species then put your hand further in your pocket to protect them. Species have become extinct since time began for many differing reasons. Is it wrong for Africans to want more land to farm?

As for horses. Yes they are stupid. Don't tell me that the horses that were engaged in the charge of the light brigade actually wanted to go galloping towrds rifle and canon fire! So they will go where they don't want too
 
Foredeckdave said:
Bog Off you drongo!! Who's philosophical musing are irrelevant ? Well maybe they are when put alongside your rantings.

I don't give a **** if he shot the dogs because he was angry. Blame the bloody owner for not keeping them under control. As far as I am concerned a dog is merely an animal - nothing more and nothing less. If you want to make one them into a pet well so be it but you take responsibility for it and don't expect others other people to feel about the animal as you do.

The majority of your post on this thread are typical of the doggy crap non-dog people have to pout up with. Crap on the streets left there by uncaring anti-social owners, and crap about them being man's best friend.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter if they're dogs, tortoises, sparrows or Thomson's gazelles; just because you own a field and run a business you don't have the right to break the law or treat animals cruelly. But as it is dogs we're talking about, does he have the right to shoot guide dogs tied to a stick? Police sniffer dogs? Working collies or labs? Or just stray family pets, regardless of whether they were indeed in any way shape or form molesting his animals?

There is a reason why, in a democracy, we have laws against cruelty to animals, specifically, in this case, dogs. He broke the law, lied, and was treated with jaw-dropping leniency for reasons that are open to speculation. Should you wish to challenge this law and stand for parliament on a pro cruelty, allow any farmer the right to destroy any life on their property in whichever way they see fit ticket, by all means do so. And we have the democratic right to make decisions about from whom and what organisations we buy our food, based upon our own ethical considerations. Hey, there may be enough of you cruelty-freaks to tip the balance in the favour of parliament changing the law and Asda and Tesco rushing to source their suppliers from like-minded maniacs. All's I'm saying is that we should be given the choice.

Hell, if it works in their favour we mightn't have to ****ing subsidise the vermin so much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back