I don't think the games should be left to the major countries of the world, that's pretty elitist. The IOC's thought on sharing the games is, I think, quite a valid one. Sport does not just belong to the well off. As for the failure to fill the stands, it had to be expected. If I was on the bones of my arse, would I spend half of my weekly wage to watch a sporting event? Hell no, my families' welfare comes first. Chris McLaughlin points to the exclusion of the Russian athletes as a reason to sink the boot, but did he bother mentioning Russia and the USA playing tit for tat in boycotting the 1980 and 1984 games? Have crimes and indiscretions been committed by athletes in the past? You bet. Sure people have been robbed at these games, but how do these compare to the tragedy of the Munich massacre? Did Mr. McLaughlin bother pointing any of this out? Hell no. We can't let reason get in the way of a half arsed reason for writing a column can we?
The Rio games has been a celebration of sport at it's very best, and deserves more that to be treated as a vehicle of ridicule. If there is any justice in this world, the Brazilian games should be remembered for the soul stirring efforts put in by those who competed. Until the day I die, I'll remember the heroic endeavour of those who competed in the 50k walk. They tore themselves apart and in some cases, fell exhausted before and after the line. And what of those thousands of helpers who freely gave of themselves, all for the sake of the games? Can the reasons behind their services be considered a failure? I don't think so. People with a superior understanding of humanity than mine, will be better able to explain the need of some to choose a negative over a positive, which is what we see in Mr. McLaughlin's article. My memories are filled with the track cycling, rowing, swimming, track and field etc, and not the shortcomings, which paled into insignificance alongside the majesty of an Olympic Games. Onya Rio!