Yeah, this annoys me. How accurate can it be to tell the exact millisecond of contact? A player can move significantly in a fraction of a second so even still frames are inconclusive.Lot of controversy over the Wirtz goal but it’s all been caused by Sky who showed the wrong picture of the decision. They showed the 2nd freeze frame when Wirtz is slightly further forward and not the one that VAR used which is the frame before which is what the automated offside picked up and shows him further back in an onside position.
The one the telly kept showing had him with his right foot planted (which did look offside to me), but the semi-automated cartoon had him with his foot still off the ground so was obviously fractionally earlier.
Yet another example to me of the futility of trying to turn a dynamic game into some sort of video game.


