1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Off the field operations

Discussion in 'Sunderland' started by Oliver's Army, Jul 5, 2023.

  1. APC

    APC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2020
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    3,321


    A very happy Monday to all who celebrate
     
    #3661
    Scout73, Nads, DH4 and 2 others like this.
  2. Oliver's Army

    Oliver's Army Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    32,444
    Likes Received:
    62,693
    MURRAY ON PLANNING OBJECTION

    Bob Murray has released the following statement against the latest development plan for the Sheepfolds area, arguing that it could block any future expansion of the Stadium of Light.

    The former Sunderland chairman has accused the Council of going back on their 'protective zone' included in the original planning blueprint, instead building as close to the SoL as possible. This would prevent any potential expansion on the South Stand.

    Murray said: “This is not just poor planning — it’s a disgrace. You don’t strangle your greatest asset and call it progress. I helped shape those protections. The Council agreed then. And now they’ve torn them up."

    He says the club recently submitted a pre-application notification for re-development and extension of the south stand: “I’m aware the Club will be formally objecting and I fully support their position. The Council’s plans are shameful, short-sighted and completely unacceptable.”

    He understands the club also received only a token reply — and only after the Council’s own application had already been filed. The Council has since claimed that ground-floor commercial units with flats above — built just metres from the stadium — could replace the buffer zone.

    Murray dismisses that as “a ridiculous explanation that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Council is trying to rewrite its own rules behind closed doors — and in doing so, it risks sabotaging a major driver of jobs, pride and regeneration forever.”

    Bob says he raised initial concerns but the Council responded with reassurances including written personal guarantees from its Chief Executive that the stadium’s future would be protected and that meaningful dialogue with the Club would continue: “None of those promises have been kept. There’s been no real consultation, no transparency and no accountability.”

    He concluded: “This isn’t just about football. It’s about Sunderland’s identity, investment and ambition. If this plan goes ahead, we risk repeating the same short-sighted mistakes that once doomed Roker Park — and the city will regret it for decades. Every fan, and every resident who cares about our city, should be outraged. We must come together to stop this before it’s too late.”
     
    #3662
    Moanjam, Montysoptician and Jarca like this.
  3. Essayyeffcee

    Essayyeffcee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2019
    Messages:
    9,674
    Likes Received:
    28,195
    From ALS fb page

    MURRAY ON PLANNING OBJECTION

    Bob Murray has released the following statement against the latest development plan for the Sheepfolds area, arguing that it could block any future expansion of the Stadium of Light.
    The former Sunderland chairman has accused the Council of going back on their 'protective zone' included in the original planning blueprint, instead building as close to the SoL as possible. This would prevent any potential expansion on the South Stand.
    Murray said: “This is not just poor planning — it’s a disgrace. You don’t strangle your greatest asset and call it progress. I helped shape those protections. The Council agreed then. And now they’ve torn them up."
    He says the club recently submitted a pre-application notification for re-development and extension of the south stand: “I’m aware the Club will be formally objecting and I fully support their position. The Council’s plans are shameful, short-sighted and completely unacceptable.”
    He understands the club also received only a token reply — and only after the Council’s own application had already been filed. The Council has since claimed that ground-floor commercial units with flats above — built just metres from the stadium — could replace the buffer zone.
    Murray dismisses that as “a ridiculous explanation that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Council is trying to rewrite its own rules behind closed doors — and in doing so, it risks sabotaging a major driver of jobs, pride and regeneration forever.”
    Bob says he raised initial concerns but the Council responded with reassurances including written personal guarantees from its Chief Executive that the stadium’s future would be protected and that meaningful dialogue with the Club would continue: “None of those promises have been kept. There’s been no real consultation, no transparency and no accountability.”
    He concluded: “This isn’t just about football. It’s about Sunderland’s identity, investment and ambition. If this plan goes ahead, we risk repeating the same short-sighted mistakes that once doomed Roker Park — and the city will regret it for decades. Every fan, and every resident who cares about our city, should be outraged. We must come together to stop this before it’s too late.”
     
    #3663
    Montysoptician likes this.
  4. Montysoptician

    Montysoptician Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,478
    Likes Received:
    14,987
    #3664
    Jarca likes this.
  5. Moanjam

    Moanjam Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    912
    This is shocking from the council.
     
    #3665
    Nads likes this.
  6. TeamOfTalents

    TeamOfTalents Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2019
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    5,709
    If they really want to be voted out they should just say that :biggrin:
     
    #3666

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 0)

  1. dyd13
  2. BUC

Share This Page