fekin ravashin Syd do you want me to get you an interview down the red light for a bestality show, pays well or so im told
NOT606 by a mile for me. Is it not just that there were more posters on the beeb more opinions equals better banter? What is your beef with not606? Anyone know the stats as to the number of safc users was there compared to here?
Don't lie Syd you rep whore - how else would you have ended up with +10 rep if you weren't putting it out there?
I was suggesting Little Jackie as being the lipstick user!! Before my time? Unfortunately, I would call you young man if we met!!!
and here we have a classic example of what hacks me off on not606- a meaningful thread hijacked with banter(its an amusing in joke for the click) but effectively the thread has been spammed and is meandering off topic. (The mags have rep ****s mackems have doggy sex) On 606 the mod would have deleted the posts as off topic, here it is indulged for obvious reasons. Why not have a "sticky" so you can have some doggy banter without spamming a decent article. Sorry to stray on topic like.
It's not the doggy banter that's funny, necessarily, it's how it's applied to different situations. a banter thread would be ****, because there's nothing to build up to it, it has no foundations. But saying that, syd does enjoy being licked out by German Shepherds
"But saying that, syd does enjoy being licked out by German Shepherds " hold on, I'll just get a needle and thread and stitch up my sides, bit like our esteemed supermod does to a pekinese after giving it a good seeing to...............................I don't believe I'm joining in, what a ****ing hypocrite. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
It was a good thread standing up on its own two/four feet and then you get a couple of pages of doggy smut and the article is dead in the water. No offence Syd, but the purpose of the article was to highlight what you liked/disliked about 606 v not606 - a question to you, would doggy banter have been allowed on bbc606 - or deleted as obscene/off topic/spam?
think you need to lighten up mate, honest. Do you read the serious threads I do, there are many, but I also have a strange sense of humour but dont ask anyone to join in, its free to dip in or out.
I do syd, I did not feel this article - which was on a serious subject once -had run its course, as I said - sorry for straying on topic. However, I get the feeling I'm backing a loser so I'll let you get on with it. Night all