Has anyone suggested the upper West Stand?

You can pay by direct debit. If you're a season pass holder didnt you know you had to get the money for a new season pass regardless of price??
How did you find the money for two Wembley trips at such short notice?
A reduction/price freeze for people who are being forced to move would be the ideal scenario,
Moving to E4 would be much more preferable than going to the north stand/west upper (providing there was space),
The price rise would be stretching my finances already, I also don't see why they've lied about the north stand being for the exclusive use of home supporters,
I might be a little more open to the idea, if I'd had any kind of consultation, coupled with a bit more time to get a deposit together
What should have happened is the away fans moved further towards the West Stand in blocks N1 - N4, leaving the East Stand as it is and extending home support round into blocks N5 - N7. This way we would be behind the goal and it would give us a 'singing area' twice as big without disturbing anyone.
Unfortunately can't see this working out. It's such a poor area to put our vocal supporters.
What should have happened is the away fans moved further towards the West Stand in blocks N1 - N4, leaving the East Stand as it is and extending home support round into blocks N5 - N7. This way we would be behind the goal and it would give us a 'singing area' twice as big without disturbing anyone.
But we can't be upsetting the suits by having away supporters nearby, can we?
Unfortunately can't see this working out. It's such a poor area to put our vocal supporters.
What should have happened is the away fans moved further towards the West Stand in blocks N1 - N4, leaving the East Stand as it is and extending home support round into blocks N5 - N7. This way we would be behind the goal and it would give us a 'singing area' twice as big without disturbing anyone.
But we can't be upsetting the suits by having away supporters nearby, can we?
I'm afraid we wouldn't, it would be exactly as it is now, just moved from right to left.
I think most would agree with this. There are bits of the lower west that could have been brought in if needed.
Unfortunately, we're stuck with making best. Fans will make it work to some degree, but hopefully the club learn the lessons and get better advice in the future.
What happens to passholders next season in N1 to N4 when we have a cup game with a team that wants its full quota, like SAFC did this season?
Evicted again?
You can be 100% sure this has not been thought about yet by the buffoons making this decision.
What happens to passholders next season in N1 to N4 when we have a cup game with a team that wants its full quota, like SAFC did this season?
Evicted again?
You can be 100% sure this has not been thought about yet by the buffoons making this decision.
I'm assuming that's the reason they're not selling season tickets in N5.
Change is good. If needed, we can just give the E4-E6. It's not behind the goal.
I don't think we'll be giving away fans E4-E6 at any time
Adam Pearson, Paul Duffen and the current regime did.![]()
When did AP say this dutch? Provide a link you keep conveniently ignoring this.
HULL City are considering changing seating arrangements at the KC Stadium in a bid to improve the atmosphere at home games.
The Tigers are looking at the possibility of moving away fans out of the North Stand, allowing City fans to fill behind both goals.
Head of football Adam Pearson believes this will give Tigers fans use of the best facilities, and help generate a better atmosphere.
"In all new stadiums away fans are in a corner, with home fans at both ends, and there is always a better atmosphere," Pearson told the Mail.
"If we were in an ideal world the stadium wouldn't be laid out as it is now.
"It can't be right to have our supporters stuck in corners of the ground with the worst facilities."
Pearson hopes it will be possible to move away fans into the north east corner of the stadium, freeing up the main area of the North Stand for Tigers fans.
But he admits a number of security issues and systems will have to be looked at before a change can be made.
"I have been told repeatedly that it is down to security reasons but hopefully we can look at it now from afresh and start taking all the obstacles out of the way," Pearson added.
The move would not be an unprecedented as both Aston Villa and Blackburn Rovers have recently moved away fans from behind the goals to accommodate their own fans.
It is also the way seating is arranged at the Arsenal, Manchester United and Chelsea.
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/HULL-...ail/story.html
Why post that ^^^^ in a question about the west stand? Oh, and it's been asked once and answered as far as I can see. (ok twice now) So I've no idea what the "keep ignoring" thing's about.Why post that ^^^^ in a question about the west stand?
Do you think they just looked at one option? How and why do you think they came up with a favoured one?
ALL stands were suggested. Previously, ALL stands were rejected. More recently, the reasons why one of those stands was rejected have been resolved. The reasons the other stands were rejected could possibly also be resolved, particularly the engineering issues.
Link? **** or get off the pot.
**** me it's Jeremy Paxman. As I asked, and you ignored, do you seriously believe they never considered it? If you do, did the reasons it was't done just mataerialise?**** me it's Jeremy Paxman. As I asked, and you ignored, do you seriously believe they never considered it? If you do, did the reasons it was't done just mataerialise?
I know you're desperate for an argument with me, but pick something else ffs. This one answers itself.