Experience of being a manager. Phelan has always been in the background and I don't believe all good assistants/coaches make good managers.What exactly do Coleman or Zola have to offer thst makes them better suited than Phelan? If anyone knows the players it is Phelan. If anyone knows how SB operated & now sees how his own imprimatur could twig it for the better it is Phelan. If anyone has got contacts to get young loan players from ManU it is Phelan. If anyone is showing professional calm fortitude under the current awful climate it is Phelan. Give him certainty and some money and see where it can bring us.
If Zola,s the best these Muppets in charge of our club can drag kicking and screaming through the doors, then you might as well just stick with Phelan, at least he,s worked with the players pre season and will hit the road running. He's no better or worse then Zola
I agree. I do feel sorry for Phelan at the moment, he is the only one said to want the job, he is in situ, care taking, good pre season, yet on a daily basis different names being announced and flaunted in front of him, he doesn't appear to be 1st, 2nd or even 3rd choice, but is still maintaining his dignity and saying nowt (although probably been told to say nowt by Dumb & Dumber.). Just wondering if after all this treatment of him and the goings ons, if he is offered will he have the last laugh and stick two fingers up to them by declining?!!
I got him at 18/1 with Sky a few days ago gives me £95.All that, plus I win £50 if he gets it...
I got him at 18/1 with Sky a few days ago gives me £95.
This is more or less correct i think.These owners know little about football but they are not thick. They must have been prepared for Steve Bruce to walk all last season, seeing how he offered to go when the relegation happened. Okay, they got Bruce to stay, but they cannot have been confident of his commitment, and rightly so, as Bruce has walked.
In this scenario the Allams have had ages to prepare for Bruce's departure, and I don't believe for a nanosecond that they were surprised when he went. And now we have this pantomime with Martinez, Coleman, Zola, Old Uncle Tom Cobley and all. If the Allams were interested in making a go of it again in the Premier League, they'd have had a replacement in ages ago.
Then there is the saga of selling the club. He'd sell tomorrow to the right owners, Isn't that what he once said? But he ends up quibbling over six million.
Nobody can be this incompetent. Any old Tom, Dick or Harry could have done better. With the new season just a week away, no replacement for Bruce, no signings, players leaving, an injury list as long as a wet week, hell, it leaves me thinking the owners intend stripping all the cash they can out of the club and letting it sink.
£5
Do the maths
He didn't say winnings. He said he gets £95 back. Does it really matter?I did, that wins him £90.
You don't count your £5 stake back as winnings.
I do and really so do you BSeasoned betters might correct me here but has there ever been a situation where 3 potential managers have all gone to odds on and none of them have been made? It's an absolute mess with nobody really knowing what's going on which suggests either a) there are zero leaks whatsoever coming from the club or b) we keep offering the job and people keep turning it down.
I don't know which one to plump for.
He didn't say winnings. He said he gets £95 back. Does it really matter?
Obviously to him it does.He didn't say winnings. He said he gets £95 back. Does it really matter?
I did, that wins him £90.
You don't count your £5 stake back as winnings.
I think the £5 was no longer his once he's paid the bookies. If he doesn't win, he doesn't get his £5 back.Well he didn't, he said 'gets'. £5 of that was already his.
Main problem with Phelan is that, if appointed, the regime will probably allocate him breadline funds, whereas, you'd surely speculate that Coleman or Zola would get a wedge to invest.