Have you been drinking?
What so you can't see the benefit in singing a player, developing him and then selling him on for profit? Especially now with FFP?
Every 100k counts.
Have you been drinking?
What so you can't see the benefit in singing a player, developing him and then selling him on for profit? Especially now with FFP?
Every 100k counts.
What so you can't see the benefit in singing a player

Is under 21 and is no harm in giving him a development deal
If he turns out to be half as good as his old man he will be a decent player.
Yes but the difference is, is that Bruce is playing his son and Alex is playing very,very well.
Charlie - if this is true there is NO difference .. two managers who have signed their own sons ...
Well there is. Bruce's son is and will be playing whereas Pearson,s son isn't and won't be either.
He has probably signed him so that he develops and maybe gets a career in League 1/2. I think Nigel was more thinking as a parent then a football manager.
Sort of like Steve Bruce did with Alex
If Bruce hadnt conceded that penalty against Cardiff in the play offs, then Kermogant would probably still be a LCFC player