Dan‽;2712658 said:Why is it a horrible idea?
Because it's just a silly idea - its going fine with 3/4 year contracts right now and thats the best way to do it, fans can become accustomed to players, players can be accustomed to clubs etc
Dan‽;2712658 said:Why is it a horrible idea?
Because it's just a silly idea - its going fine with 3/4 year contracts right now and thats the best way to do it, fans can become accustomed to players, players can be accustomed to clubs etc
Dan‽;2712672 said:What are you talking about?
Answering your question. If you don't understand I'm not saying it any mroe clearly.
Dan‽;2712699 said:I don't understand what you're saying because you're an idiot. You clearly know nothing about what you're talking about, so just stop. The draft isn't a reshuffle of every player in the league, you tool.
It really annoys me when people like you preach their opinions on something without knowing the slightest thing about it.
Shut up, a little misunderstanding? Wooo yeah i'm an idiot
Maybe tell me I misunderstood the idea rather than call me an idiot
As I understand it (I could be wrong), the draft only applies to newly 'graduated', so to speak, youngsters, so you wouldn't be able to choose someone else's best player. Once they're contracted to the team, they belong to that team.
So to apply this to 'soccer', it would be like having an independent academy league and the premier league teams would get to pick players from the pool of graduates every year. They have a similar draft system in the MLS in America, if you're interested in how it would apply to soccer, taking players from colleges, generally, like they do in gridiron.
It wouldn't really work in most countries though because, as Lff says, they don't have the well-developed college sports leagues they have in the states. We wouldn't have any incentive to develop our own youth players if they were just going to be drafted by some other team.
Dan‽;2712509 said:Not academies, college players, completely unaffiliated with any team.
Dan‽;2712721 said:It's not a little misunderstanding, it's complete ignorance, you clearly knew nothing about the system at all yet you still felt the need to preach your opinions. And okay, I will tell you that you misunderstood it, I'll even go back in time to do it, and I'll do it with a different username, too:
it's a misunderstanding, I gave my opinion based on (how i thought) it worked - I havent' had time to read the WHOLE thread
I'm not even going to respond to you again
Dan‽;2712699 said:I don't understand what you're saying because you're an idiot. You clearly know nothing about what you're talking about, so just stop. The draft isn't a reshuffle of every player in the league, you tool.
It really annoys me when people like you preach their opinions on something without knowing the slightest thing about it.
I strong appose the draft system. I would struggle to enjoy any success of my team as in the back of my mind would always know all these players are going to be taken by everyone else before next season...
It does ensure that the balance of power in the NFL does swing and switch reguarly with no one club finding it easy to gain long term dominance.
Because it's just a silly idea - its going fine with 3/4 year contracts right now and thats the best way to do it, fans can become accustomed to players, players can be accustomed to clubs etc
There would be no pinching from academies. There would be no academies. All students would rightly have to go through university and then enter the draft from which they would be picked. This is a much better system as generally all come out with college degrees at 22 before going into the sport. This also gives them 2/3/4 seasons of game time at a competitive level to learn their trade before making the step up. There would be some elitism at the university level with the best kids going to the best sporting universities, however to get into these universities they would still have to pass all of their A-levels, probably with all C's. The current model we use is way behind the American Collegiate system. Why do you think all the best athletes (footballers excluded) go out there to study? Golfers, Tennis players, Track and Field...
They don't get good qualifications though, what you get is colleges going out of their way to ensure their players are able to stay in college just so they can play for the team, giving them easy courses and bending the rules so they scrape passes, and most of them never actually graduate with anything to show for it. It's a horrible encroachment of sport and commercial interests into education in my opinion and I'm glad it doesn't happen here!
(though with fees increasing and ever more privatisation of the educational sector who knows what the future holds?)
Well good for him, but let's face it, most of them are in the stupid category!
¡Conman - "The Physio"!;2713130 said:For the best sporting Universities in the country, even 3 C's is nowhere near enough. I'm at Loughborough Uni myself, and although I don't study Sports Science personally, I do know a lot of people on the Sports Science course. Their miniumum requirements were at least AAB at A Level, and even that might not have been enough for some people.