You guys are mentioning him more than me, in fact when I was talking about Favre, you lot brought Rafa up.
We need someone in that's going to create an identity. A passing style of play.. Stop jumping to ****ing trophies..
So why pick on him? He's highlighting the deficiencies in the other candidates. So what if he wants Rafa. I'd rather have Rafa at this stage and I reckon the consortium do too.
" Success in football is measured by how many trophies you've won " Horsesh!t..it depends on the situation a club is in at any given time. Given our current situation, any manager that keeps us up has succeeded. If he then gets us competing for European places, he's succeeded. Allardyce, Pulis, Warnock etc may not be everyone's cup of tea, however you cannot deny they've succeeded in the remit they've often been given.
Yes he generally is however he appears to have a good knowledge of managers and their skillset. But there's no need to ridicule him especially when he's just voicing his opinions
I had years of ridicule on here for what was described as negativity. The guy's obsessed with rafa and the clues in the name. 3 weeks into a takeover and I can already hear the moaning.
Ten Hag has been managing less than 10 years. Nagelsmann is nearly 30 years younger than Favre and has only been managing for 3 years.
Was that rafman? No. So you should know what it's like and not inflict that on a common fan. The Rafa stuff aside he gives good feedback on the other managers which should be welcomed. I, on the other hand, no **** all about Favre, the Viking or Fonseca other than looking at their stats. Tottenham is the only name linked to Fonseca Palace only side linked to Favre No links to the Viking I just honestly have no idea other than anyone is better than Steve Bruce. Yes @Geordieginola even Wilder