I just enjoy them, not so much a believer. I disclaim every time I use them fella. It's nothing more than comparing stats from our best performers to the leagues best performers, or addressing prominent subjects. My opinion isn't forced on it. For example you brought up the keeping stats, my opinion would be the starts don't and can't represent the quality and technique of the de Gea's goalkeeping which in my opinion is where he's shown himself develop into a world class keeper this season. Think you're reading too much into my incentive for posting the stat. Take the Larsson set, I'd say his stats show that this season he's shown himself to be a decent all round Midfielder, but do i think he's in the same league as the other two? Do I heck, though I do think there's been a dozen better Midfielders than Coutinho this season and he shouldn't have been in the PFA team of the year. The Catts stats, there's been a lot of noise in regards to referee tolerance so I took all of the highest fouling midfielders until I got to Catts, took the relevant information and processed it. My opinions on it? A person could reasonably interject that the severity of his tackles can't be presented which would be completely valid. My personal opinion on it, seeing every game Catts has played this season is half his bookings weren't even bookable offences ranging from bad decisions to good tackles to very soft cautions. But that's my opinion based on seeing not the stats which is the sort of debate that it should create. It's good to talk about footy.
I just like the debate it can generate that's all. You get me blud?