Looks very impressive hopefully it will be finished on time
I'm going to guess that, unlike the Daily Mail, they also know what the initial projected cost of the stadium was...I read on another, normally very reliable Spurs site, that Donna Cullen has been directly quoted as saying that everything is on schedule. There's no actual quotation, unfortunately, but it seems to be genuine. That's about as close to genuine information as anything out there. At least, she would know, as opposed to the 'run of the mill' my cousin's, best mate's, milkman says.........On that score, a member of my family is heavily involved in the air-conditioning contract and is saying NOTHING.
I'm going to guess that, unlike the Daily Mail, they also know what the initial projected cost of the stadium was...
Is it too much to hope that, if the stadium is finished on time and on budget, Levy's first action after declaring the stadium open will be to slap the Mail with a libel suit?In contrast to The Mail on Sunday's re-hashed and unsubstantiated article, here's one that actually quotes the club......and guess what?
December 5 – Tottenham Hotspur have said that the construction costs for the club’s new stadium on the site of the old White Hart Lane ground are still forecast to come in between £750 million and £800 million, and not hit the £1 billion cost reported.
http://www.insideworldfootball.com/2017/12/05/spurs-new-stadium-costs-forecast-come-750-800m/
What a ****ing surprise. The Mail are still running the £1 billion 'story' today, despite this and completely ignoring it. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story, eh boys?
Additionally, a regular poster on another site who has purchased Premium Seats and attended a viewing over the w/e says he was told then that the build is actually 6 weeks ahead of schedule.
Is it too much to hope that, if the stadium is finished on time and on budget, Levy's first action after declaring the stadium open will be to slap the Mail with a libel suit?
Not libel, but AFAIK there is a commercial counterpart for "fake news" .
For example, if you published something untrue about the
financial health/state of a PLC, and that caused a run on their
share price, then you would be subject to such a sh*t-storm.
The fact that THFC have had to comment ASAP on the Fail
claims is proof enough that you cannot have morons talking
financial b*llocks about you.

Propagating false information knowing that it would impact on a Companies share price is a Criminal offence in most Jurisdictions. So in this case, the Fail continuing to spew forth these falsehoods after they have been shown to be such, would appear to likely be guilty of an offence, as stating that a company was going to run 25% over budget on a project on which that companies future growth is indelibly linked would appear to tick that box.It was called Malicious Falsehood back in my day or Negligent Misstatement for the less intentionally harmful comment. It's almost certainly called something else these days. Most things that I learned are.
Tellingly, none of the other papers that are pedlars of complete bollocks have gone anywhere near this. That tells you all that you need to know about this fiction. The newspapers don't like Levy but I'm pretty sure that they don't fancy a legal battle with him. If there was any backing to the claim, they'd be all over it.

How big does the bald spot get before it needs to be addressed?..........answers on a postcard, please.
Is it too much to hope that, if the stadium is finished on time and on budget, Levy's first action after declaring the stadium open will be to slap the Mail with a libel suit?
The Sun regurgitated the Mail's story last week.Tellingly, none of the other papers that are pedlars of complete bollocks have gone anywhere near this. That tells you all that you need to know about this fiction. The newspapers don't like Levy but I'm pretty sure that they don't fancy a legal battle with him. If there was any backing to the claim, they'd be all over it.
