Let’s not forget it was you who started this debate by criticising people for not believing him
“Where's the spin? He's agreed to lower the price of the Club to the extent of writing off debt and admits his mistakes from last season.It's a sure sign that they're serious about moving on(isn't that what we all want for the future of our Club),yet the same posters belittle it,mock it and call him a liar!!!
WTF do people want?”
Lots of people have explained why they don’t believe him, and given good, evidence based, examples too.
As an example, my take on him making the statement about giving the club away if he couldn’t sell it being said in a pre planned media interview wasn’t me ‘surmising’ anything. It was said in a pre planned media interview, that is just a fact. You seem to have ‘surmised’ that for some reason in the middle of the interview, which he had arranged at a time and place to suit him with the support of his media staff, he said something he didn’t mean due to some apparent ‘heat of the moment’
Now as I merely stated a fact, any chance you could explain why you surmised that?
So also there have been lots of examples of why people don’t believe what he says specifically about writing the debt off. (Lies about it being owed to the bank, statements over a year ago that the price would go down which came to nothing)
Now, rather than you just questioning everyone else’s belief, could you explain why it is that you believe that he will write down the debt sufficiently to reduce the price to make the club more sellable?
Given that you started this debate, and people have answered your criticism, I don’t that is too much to ask. I for one am genuinely interested in what evidence you have considered when deciding to believe him
Thanks