You're right. We don't know what new owners would be like.
I, and many others, campaigned to get rid of the Needler/Fish regime. Some disagreed with us. Needler, Fish and Dolan went and we got Lloyd and Wilby.
We campaigned to get rid of Lloyd and, by that point, Appleton. A handful disagreed with us at first. They went and we got, eventually, Hinchliffe and Buchanan.
We campaigned to get rid of Hinchliffe and Buchanan. We came as close to extinction as we'd ever been. But then we got Adam Pearson and the modern Hull City was born.
My point is that there's nothing wrong with wanting better. And getting from A to B isn't always a linear journey. The Allams have done some good things on the pitch and deserve credit for sorting out the academy (before letting all of its products leave for relative peanuts). But they've been the most divisive, antagonistic owners we've had in my time supporting the club. I - and evidently many others - want better. We want owners that value us as fans, who want what we want, who keep their egos in check and respect the club's heritage. If the next owners don't do that, we'll campaign for better again. Wanting better is what football fans do. It may seem irrational to some, but supporting a football team is irrational when looked at coldly. I've no time for this 'be careful what you wish for' mantra some chant at us Allam critics. If we had been careful what we were wishing for in the 90s, we might still be playing at a crumbling Boothferry Park with owners in some way connected to the motley bunch mentioned above. Wishing for better isn't wrong, even when there are no guarantees that you'll get it.