New owner confirmed…

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Which didnt match what they wanted. So they must be able to get a return somehow. God knows how.

These are people who thought shortening our name would make us more successful, so tried to make it longer.

These are people who introduced a membership scheme which alienated almost the entire fan base and caused a third of our fans to go AWOL.

Don't just assume there's some sort of master plan here, they're a pair of ****wits.
 
No, because the question makes no sense at all. They've manufactured the situation that we find ourselves in, so I suppose it depends whether they want to safeguard their CV or are happy to see an almighty failure on it.

The problem with these people they don't see it as a blot of their CV, they will just keep spouting that under their ownership, we got twice promoted to the top flight, got to a cup final and into Europe. All the other **** they don't care about, they do it their way and they are always right.
 
Are you becoming an Allam apologist Chazz? If they didn't want to spend to keep us in this division it's well documented that they've had their chances to sell at a profit. At this stage there should be no apologies made for them.

But they did spend. They spent wrongly and brought in players we didn't need but they spent. It's well documented that potential buyers have held an interest. Nobody has a clue what those deals were or what they were worth except for the two parties involved.

The Allams accepted a bid which was prevented by the fit & proper persons test.

There is a total lack of perspective regarding the Allams and all the hysterical hissy fitting and dummy spitting ironically makes many no better than them. We look like a spoiled bunch of demanding self important turds to any outsiders.
 
How do I block comments from chaz the clown.....Had enough now. He's ruining this board.

Click on their avatar. A box appears with a few details and options. One near the end is 'ignore'. Click that and you no longer see their posts. You still see it when people quote them though.
 
No, because the question makes no sense at all. They've manufactured the situation that we find ourselves in, so I suppose it depends whether they want to safeguard their CV or are happy to see an almighty failure on it.
Shame i thought we debated on here. Seemed reasonable. Like a lot of owners theyve gambled and got into the PL, some have gambled and havent got there. Now do they put us even more in debt to try and keep us there. Or do they claw some of the money back so we arent in debt as much?

Sunderland are well over 100 million in debt and he wants out and appears unwilling to spend anymore.
 
Shame i thought we debated on here. Seemed reasonable. Like a lot of owners theyve gambled and got into the PL, some have gambled and havent got there. Now do they put us even more in debt to try and keep us there. Or do they claw some of the money back so we arent in debt as much?

Supposedly they could have got all their money back plus a tidy profit a few months back. City would have been debt free.
 
Still nobody have any info on who the consortium are who pearsons connected too
The one somebody mentioned could go through at the end of the season?

Seems quite big news that nobodys focussing on
 
This is what always confuses me. Keeping Bruce and bringing in 6-7 players would have likely meant staying up and the allams making money, but they actively tried not to do that.

Wrong person to ask really. I'd have got rid of Bruce when we had the chance of getting Pulis.

It seems bringing in 6 or 7 players is what Ehab Allam was afraid of after Diomande and Nick Powell. The relationship between Bruce and Allam had broken down it wouldn't have worked. It wouldn't surprise me if Diomande wasn't Bruce's revenge for not getting Andre Gray.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hutch-tiger69
Wrong person to ask really. I'd have got rid of Bruce when we had the chance of getting Pulis.

It seems bringing in 6 or 7 players is what Ehab Allam was afraid of after Diomande and Nick Powell. The relationship between Bruce and Allam had broken down it wouldn't have worked. It wouldn't surprise me if Diomande wasn't Bruce's revenge for not getting Andre Gray.

Any info on the party linked with pearson obadiah
 
Any info on the party linked with pearson obadiah

Not really other than it may be that PR company from China who said they'd pay the £130 million asking price just to get their feet in the door? They don't seem to have any money but they may have clients that do.

I suspect if they are listening to Adam Pearson he'll be telling them to wait and see if we get relegated as the purchase price will go down.
 
Not really other than it may be that PR company from China who said they'd pay the £130 million asking price just to get their feet in the door? They don't seem to have any money but they may have clients that do.

I suspect if they are listening to Adam Pearson he'll be telling them to wait and see if we get relegated as the purchase price will go down.

At least theres a ray of hope , interested partys wise
I guess that sounds very sensible not as if theyve got any competition thanks to boy wonder lol
Be nice a fresh start in the championship with a new owner fingers crossed
 
At least theres a ray of hope , interested partys wise
I guess that sounds very sensible not as if theyve got any competition thanks to boy wonder lol
Be nice a fresh start in the championship with a new owner fingers crossed

Maybe new owners, but I bet the Allams put us into administration before they **** off!