But we aren't selling to make money are we? We are selling because players either won't sign new deals or teams come in with stupid offers and the player kicks up a fuss etc.
Don't try fudging over the scary truths!
But we aren't selling to make money are we? We are selling because players either won't sign new deals or teams come in with stupid offers and the player kicks up a fuss etc.
So, in that case we'll spend a good £20m on top of what we sell and bring is some real humdingers! Hurray!But we aren't selling to make money are we? We are selling because players either won't sign new deals or teams come in with stupid offers and the player kicks up a fuss etc.
Why do you think I am annoyed? I am watching the referendum results and idly commenting on here while I await a result that actually matters. However, I feel like this manager search is more like Supermarket Sweep than a black box special.
If you look at the pound it is rising, that is a good indicator. All the trade guys etc will know the results first of all.Why do you think I am annoyed? I am watching the referendum results and idly commenting on here while I await a result that actually matters. However, I feel like this manager search is more like Supermarket Sweep than a black box special.
But we aren't selling to make money are we? We are selling because players either won't sign new deals or teams come in with stupid offers and the player kicks up a fuss etc.
So, in that case we'll spend a good £20m on top of what we sell and bring is some real humdingers! Hurray!![]()
So, in that case we'll spend a good £20m on top of what we sell and bring is some real humdingers! Hurray!![]()
Think he's saying that we've been buying using primarily the money recouped from those sales, and spending little beyond. Now that we have a large windfall inbound for the next three years, it'll be interesting to see whether that pattern continues, or the money goes to pay back Liebherr.
Not saying Katharina is demanding all the money back now, but Rodgers said at the beginning of last season that he was seeking to reduce our liabilities to KL.Think he's saying that we've been buying using primarily the money recouped from those sales, and spending little beyond. Now that we have a large windfall inbound for the next three years, it'll be interesting to see whether that pattern continues, or the money goes to pay back Liebherr.
Did someone not post his week that without player sales, we'd have lost money form the last accounts? I don't know if that was true, but if so, let them club be safe with the money.
I feel Southampton are quite good at hiding profit...While true, many of those sales involved players Cortese purchased in the oh-my-god-he-will-bankrupt-us-all era, and one of the interesting sidenotes in our books is that we're owed a giant sum on transfers that hasn't been recouped...consequently, we could take a year-to-year loss but have a large long-term credit that'd more than offset.
Even if it does start off by going back to lay Liebherr, that's still good financial management. You can't just out one hand over an eye so you don't see that debt.
While true, many of those sales involved players Cortese purchased in the oh-my-god-he-will-bankrupt-us-all era, and one of the interesting sidenotes in our books is that we're owed a giant sum on transfers that hasn't been recouped...consequently, we could take a year-to-year loss but have a large long-term credit that'd more than offset.
While true, many of those sales involved players Cortese purchased in the oh-my-god-he-will-bankrupt-us-all era, and one of the interesting sidenotes in our books is that we're owed a giant sum on transfers that hasn't been recouped...consequently, we could take a year-to-year loss but have a large long-term credit that'd more than offset.
I feel Southampton are quite good at hiding profit...
Sorry DTLW, I've just realised this can't be right. There were some locally placed bets yesterday.