New Kit?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

If they hadn’t done it first would prefer Castleford’s kit to any of the suggestions on here.
 
And why did we originally change from stripes? Do you know?

I don't know. From checking on HullCityKits for my previous post it looks like we first did it in the mid 30s and then had the more well-known Raich Carter era kit a decade or so later. I know there's been talk of colour shortages around WW2 which maybe led to us wearing blue for a bit at one point? But not sure whether any of that relates to the answer to your question.
 
I don't know. From checking on HullCityKits for my previous post it looks like we first did it in the mid 30s and then had the more well-known Raich Carter era kit a decade or so later. I know there's been talk of colour shortages around WW2 which maybe led to us wearing blue for a bit at one point? But not sure whether any of that relates to the answer to your question.
As I’ve always understood it, we were going to change to Blue and Gold and the badge was going to be 3 crowns. All to reflect the City as a whole as the council had used those motifs. Not sure why it never happened
 
As I’ve always understood it, we were going to change to Blue and Gold and the badge was going to be 3 crowns. All to reflect the City as a whole as the council had used those motifs. Not sure why it never happened

It was going to be blue and orange. Needler wanted to change the name to Kingston Upon Hull AFC. There was an outcry, the HDM were sensible and took the fans side and he backed down, But Needler did not like striped kits and insisted on a plain amber one. Wonder if we would have kept the nickname if he had got his way? Being orange we could have been the Satsumas.<laugh>

The programmes for the first games at Boothferry Park were printed in advance and featured the proposed new kit.
You must log in or register to see images
 
I don't know. From checking on HullCityKits for my previous post it looks like we first did it in the mid 30s and then had the more well-known Raich Carter era kit a decade or so later. I know there's been talk of colour shortages around WW2 which maybe led to us wearing blue for a bit at one point? But not sure whether any of that relates to the answer to your question.

No. I have explained it another post, if you read it. All to do with Harold Needler wanting to change the name, like Allam he wanted to shorten it, in his case to Kingston Upon Hull AFC, and change the colours to orange and blue.There was only I season prior to WW2, when it was an ultramarine blue. Ironically that was the year the steam loco bearing the name Hull City was built so the nameplate was blue. After the war it was black with gold lettering Despite it being repainted with stripes it never had amber on it during its days of running on the railway. We did wear pale blue for one season after the war because of shortage of dyes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarbyDays
Peeled by the satsumas! Your getting peeled by the satsumas!

It was going to be blue and orange. Needler wanted to change the name to Kingston Upon Hull AFC. There was an outcry, the HDM were sensible and took the fans side and he backed down, But Needler did not like striped kits and insisted on a plain amber one. Wonder if we would have kept the nickname if he had got his way? Being orange we could have been the Satsumas.<laugh>

The programmes for the first games at Boothferry Park were printed in advance and featured the proposed new kit.
You must log in or register to see images
 
When we did or didn't have stripes historically is kind of irrelevant. The five years we spent in the PL - always in stripes - have given us a world-wide, identifiable and iconic brand that we could only dream about 20 years ago. I know people in Brazil who recognise the kit and know the club and the nickname. To abandon that now would be a mistake IMHO.
 
From 1947-1960, 1964-1975 and 1982-1990 we didn’t have traditional solid black and amber stripes. Plain amber shirts or amber with black pinstripes have been just as common in our history.

But pink tutus or something.

Historical Football Kits is a good site, isn’t it?
 
I like mainly amber with black pinstripes. The 09/10 and 15/16 kits were nice. Traditional black and amber stripes are nice but it gets boring three years in a row.

Juventus, the two Milan clubs, Newcastle and others must be awful to follow then, stripes year after year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ehab's Member