Sorry to move (even further) off topic but, after the "live" debate (I personally think AKCJ is being mocked harshly), can you encounter someone without physically meeting them?
Sorry if this has been mentioned before on here but when does the away kit come out? Smart shirt though & McG looks good with the GK colours!
[video=youtube;TF8zmo7VJPQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TF8zmo7VJPQ[/video] Rotterdam- twinned with Hull. Feyenoord - a club that cherishes its identity.
Stop been ****. They've had to photoshop the sponsor on last minute and you can't buy the kit until after the European games. How many other clubs have these problems? How many previous City regimes have had these problems? You've become obsessed with moaning about people moaning about the owners or the way the club is run. If something is **** people will say it's ****, you seem determined to take the piss out of every post complaining about the club under the Allams, regardless of what they're saying and how valid the point is.
I agree apart from the badge. But whose saying it isn't? Or are you saying that if the kit is nice we shouldn't moan about anything else?
Moan about what you like. Its the internet no one cares. Badge looks great too. You might not like the reasoning behind it but it looks great.
Agree with that, definitely looks better, just a shame about the baggage and the fact it leaves the name off to compensate for the new name 1904.
I really don't think it looks good with the shield. Aesthetically the black outline of the shield blending into the black lines on the kit is very poor. The most attractive "simplification" of the badge would have been having just the tiger's head
Also agree with that. If we were formed today it'd be a great badge. I wouldn't even mind the name being off it. It's just what it represents, which clearly isnt my team.
My friend did say it was red in colour and I chose not to believe him. If this turns out to be true, I'll never hear the end of it.
