Never mind spuds

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Paulpowersleftfoot

Paulpowersleftfoot

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
4,517
2,733
113
Thought we all lived in Stockport?
At least Crouch doesn't want to leave you,what a talent that guy is.
What was wobble chops thinking putting that windowlicker up front and no defensive mid against our front four?
Maybe he had a touch on the man city Ht/ft 7-1 on offer?
It's the only plausible explanation,a bit of extra wedge to pay the taxman when he next comes knocking
 
Wobblechops, taxman, Crouch is rubbish, how very unoriginal.

Thanks for taking the time to stop by though :)
 
I was going to close this, but he honestly has a point about Crouch up front on his own and the lack of a holding player.

He's still a pillock, obviously.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
I was going to close this, but he honestly has a point about Crouch up front on his own and the lack of a holding player.

He's still a pillock, obviously.
Click to expand...

He didn't say anything about on his own. You're giving him too much credit.

As for holding player, who could we play? Huddlestone's still not fully fit, Sandro's injured and Palacios is off to Stoke.
 
What about Kaboul?
He's played there before and we had Bassong available to take his place in defence.
 
Whilst watching the Champions League(in Spain) draw on my laptop saw atleast 3 Spaniards ask who are Man City,i just had to tell them "Oh just some Arabs little play thing"they had no idea who the hell they were.Oh such a big club:emoticon-0116-evilg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back