Negative Man Utd....

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
<laugh> be a travesty if a negative team such as ourselves won the league

smalling and vidic look brilliant <ok>
 
That was a good confidence booster before Chelsea, and also good for the goal difference. Although every year people claim it may all come down to goal difference...and it never does!

TuckersLaw said:
They do play some bloody nice triangles though <laugh>
Click to expand...

<laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh>

Pass and move and pass and move and pass and move and...wait, what do we do now again? Oh yeah, pass until we lose possession...
 
Our defence was a mess at the start of the season. Now its tighter than a ducks arse.

And we have the best attack in the league, arsenals is close but not close enough.
 
Because it wasnt the same defence at the start of the season. We had new players bedding in and old ones getting injured.

Only vidic has been 100% and we have no got a great defence.

A lot of respect to Chris Smalling aswell.
 
Wenger's Optician said:
I was actually wondering how a world class defence such as yours has only conceded two less goals than ours.
Click to expand...

Cos our superior attacking philosophy and positive approach to the game leaves our defence more vulnerable. In contrast, Arsenal regularly park the bus and play with two holding midfielders, like they did at home against Stoke, Wolves, City and West Ham. You tried to do the same against us at OT, but we were just too good.
 
Swarbs said:
Cos our superior attacking philosophy and positive approach to the game leaves our defence more vulnerable. In contrast, Arsenal regularly park the bus and play with two holding midfielders, like they did at home against Stoke, Wolves, City and West Ham. You tried to do the same against us at OT, but we were just too good.
Click to expand...
#<ok>
 
Swarbs said:
Cos our superior attacking philosophy and positive approach to the game leaves our defence more vulnerable. In contrast, Arsenal regularly park the bus and play with two holding midfielders, like they did at home against Stoke, Wolves, City and West Ham. You tried to do the same against us at OT, but we were just too good.
Click to expand...

Ah, that explains it.
 
Our defense has only conceded 2 less than yours because of our defensive approach apparently <doh>

You'd think that a team who's aim is apparently not to conceded and to just get men behind the ball would concede hardly any.
 
Arsenal have scored 97 goals in all competitions this season. Only Barca have scored more goals out of all European teams in the top 4 leagues in Europe. United are way back on 75 goals or something pathetic like that <ok>
 
littleDinosaurLuke said:
Goals scored don't show the whole picture.

Arsenal have in fact had 1,543,765 attempts on goal, of which 1,123,972 were on target, have completed 23,765,087 passes and average 99.6% possession in all games. Unfortunately for them it's Chamakh or Bendtner up front when van Persie's injured.
Click to expand...

<laugh>
 
What an unusual thing to say. I was led to believe that the more goals you score, the more likely you are to win a trophy <yikes>

Mr Dinosaur, I don't really know what that is meant to mean, all our pretty triangles and inneffective walk the ball into the next bollox has resulted in us scoring far more goals than your lot. I'd also take Bendtner and Chamakh over your fat ogre 7 days of the week, 52 weeks of the year. They both outscore him easily this season in open play <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back