Mouser Watch #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The RDBD said:
Close to 700 comments already on HYS. :D
I like one comment stating that this study mirrors Lawros'
prediction league.

But more significantly for the bitter Mousers ...

Spurs final points total EXACTLY matched the "luck" predictions.
Which means Spurs DESERVED a certain 2-2 result last season.
Click to expand...
Was it carried out by the University of Bath Liverpool supporters club?
 
deedub93 said:
Was it carried out by the University of Bath Liverpool supporters club?
Click to expand...

Who knows ?? :)

But again, they show Spurs in a true light.

Apparently there was a "luck" GD of +10.
But subtracting 10 goals from the GF does not affect the points total.
It seems that (in the absence of the detailed data) the "luck"
really did even itself out for Spurs over all of last season.
 
The RDBD said:
Close to 700 comments already on HYS. :D
I like one comment stating that this study mirrors Lawros'
prediction league.

But more significantly for the bitter Mousers ...

Spurs final points total EXACTLY matched the "luck" predictions.
Which means Spurs DESERVED a certain 2-2 result last season.
Click to expand...
Nope. They explicitly use that game as a reason that Liverpool should've gained points.
"The key game may have been their 2-2 draw with Tottenham on Feb. 4: taking all three points instead of settling for a dramatic point would have helped them keep pace in the race for second."
Shows that the whole thing is clearly bollocks.

Somehow they reviewed 14 incidents in Liverpool games and gave them 12 points! <laugh>
They also mention Leicester being lucky by scoring 3 times after injury time overran, which shows a fundamental ignorance of the rules.
The number on the board is a minimum. Who doesn't know that, FFS? <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego, Spur of the Moment and humanbeingincroydon
PleaseNotPoll said:
Nope. They explicitly use that game as a reason that Liverpool should've gained points.
"The key game may have been their 2-2 draw with Tottenham on Feb. 4: taking all three points instead of settling for a dramatic point would have helped them keep pace in the race for second."
Click to expand...

Unless I get for each club, the "analysis" list for all 38 PL games
played, then there is nothing more to say.

Or in your example, the Lamela penalty has to be shown emphatically
to be "luck" (or is it the Wanyama worldy they are claiming is that :) ) .
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Spur of the Moment said:
Another suggestion that this was conducted by Mousers!! :emoticon-0148-yes:
Click to expand...
I had a quick look at their methodology and I wish that I hadn't bothered. They included deflected goals. <doh>

If something that they deemed lucky happened, then they redid the whole match and came up with another result entirely.
Somehow this resulted in us having the same number of points and losing 10 goals, despite them believing that we were unlucky overall.
14 teams had poor luck, while only 6 were lucky, apparently.

http://www.espnluckindex.com/methodology/
Absolute ****ing nonsense! <laugh>
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
I had a quick look at their methodology and I wish that I hadn't bothered. They included deflected goals. <doh>

If something that they deemed lucky happened, then they redid the whole match and came up with another result entirely.
Somehow this resulted in us having the same number of points and losing 10 goals, despite them believing that we were unlucky overall.
14 teams had poor luck, while only 6 were lucky, apparently.

http://www.espnluckindex.com/methodology/
Absolute ****ing nonsense! <laugh>
Click to expand...
That whole scenario was almost what the emoji <doh> was invented for!
 
littleDinosaurLuke said:
The Liverpool crowd is so angry and aggressive.
It's very noticeable when you watch them play.
Especially when the cameras pick up fans' reactions.
Click to expand...
That doesnt matter, the fact that they are proud of it is the issue. I used to love going to klanfield, its probably why I can handle working in the DRC, its very tribal, its the DRC without AK47's.

EDIT

It's the DRC without AK47's openly on display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
deedub93 said:
Wheelchair injured? Wrong thread.

Edit, he lasted 65 minutes thus season, things are looking up.
Click to expand...
When he finally decides his career is over he could always star in a remake of the Invisible Man!! Totally feckin' anonymous. <laugh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back