Mouser Watch #2

Was it carried out by the University of Bath Liverpool supporters club?

 

Who knows ??

But again, they show Spurs in a true light.

Apparently there was a "luck" GD of +10.
But subtracting 10 goals from the GF does not affect the points total.
It seems that (in the absence of the detailed data) the "luck"
really did even itself out for Spurs over all of last season.

 

Nope. They explicitly use that game as a reason that Liverpool should've gained points.
"The key game may have been their 2-2 draw with Tottenham on Feb. 4: taking all three points instead of settling for a dramatic point would have helped them keep pace in the race for second."
Shows that the whole thing is clearly bollocks.

Somehow they reviewed 14 incidents in Liverpool games and gave them 12 points!
They also mention Leicester being lucky by scoring 3 times after injury time overran, which shows a fundamental ignorance of the rules.
The number on the board is a minimum. Who doesn't know that, FFS?

 

Unless I get for each club, the "analysis" list for all 38 PL games
played, then there is nothing more to say.

Or in your example, the Lamela penalty has to be shown emphatically
to be "luck" (or is it the Wanyama worldy they are claiming is that ) .

 

Another suggestion that this was conducted by Mousers!!

 

Rule Four
Players are only offsiiiiiiide when they score against us, the cheating ****s

 

I had a quick look at their methodology and I wish that I hadn't bothered. They included deflected goals.

If something that they deemed lucky happened, then they redid the whole match and came up with another result entirely.
Somehow this resulted in us having the same number of points and losing 10 goals, despite them believing that we were unlucky overall.
14 teams had poor luck, while only 6 were lucky, apparently.

http://www.espnluckindex.com/methodology/
Absolute ****ing nonsense!

 

Your METHODOLOGY decided their METHOD was absolute etc etc.

 

That whole scenario was almost what the emoji was invented for!

 

Not sure why she sees this as an excuse to intimidate people with threats of violence, but each to their own...

 

The Liverpool crowd is so angry and aggressive.
It's very noticeable when you watch them play.
Especially when the cameras pick up fans' reactions.

 

No wonder the linesman didn't dare flag Salah for being offside...

 

That doesnt matter, the fact that they are proud of it is the issue. I used to love going to klanfield, its probably why I can handle working in the DRC, its very tribal, its the DRC without AK47's.

EDIT

It's the DRC without AK47's openly on display.

 

Fewer AK47s, anyway...

 

Not at klanfield, there were more than 13,000 mousers between him and the top of the stand, come on PNP, I thought you understood the rules of football.

 

As Shankley always said, the crowd are the 12th man. That's why they count in offside decisions.

 

Winaldium (spelling) offside? His days at klanfield are numbered.

 

Wheelchair injured? Wrong thread.

Edit, he lasted 65 minutes thus season, things are looking up.

 

When he finally decides his career is over he could always star in a remake of the Invisible Man!! Totally feckin' anonymous.