****in ell mate, rafa was a long long time ago, get over itScousers are the only people on earth who were ever interested in "net spend", how can you be so much of a traitor to Rafa the inventor of it![]()

****in ell mate, rafa was a long long time ago, get over itScousers are the only people on earth who were ever interested in "net spend", how can you be so much of a traitor to Rafa the inventor of it![]()

I will never get over Rafa, he shown the world how to sell 2 or 3 good players and buy 7 or 8 **** players with the proceeds.****in ell mate, rafa was a long long time ago, get over it![]()

Yes, yes he is.I will never get over Rafa, he shown the world how to sell 2 or 3 good players and buy 7 or 8 **** players with the proceeds.
Rafa, the net spend king![]()
Yup, klopp should hang his head in shame what with moureen building teams on a shoestring and allYep, no cheque book manager like Klopp![]()

Seriously, City were reported to be interested in VvD but balked at the price, they would probably have bought him for around £60m last year (I think we might have also) but, coming off a serious injury he has shown nothing like his previous league form (not surprising since he obviously wasn't happy at his club) but more worrying, he has been just as bad at international level. It pays to make sure a player is over a serious injury before adding £15m to his valuation.Yup, klopp should hang his head in shame what with moureen building teams on a shoestring and all![]()
Wake me up when the net spend spiel is over![]()
You must log in or register to see images
Poor Harry wont put up with his pittance of a wage for much longer.
I'm offended Chris smalling earns more than me and I'm not "better than messi" so God knows how Mr Kane feels about it.
[HASHTAG]#cheapspudsfordinner[/HASHTAG]
£75m is crazy money for a Dutch lesbian, even in today`s massively inflated market, they could have spent the Coutinho money more wisely in my opinion.
£75m is crazy money for a Dutch lesbian, even in today`s massively inflated market, they could have spent the Coutinho money more wisely in my opinion.
For that money you could get 2 Davinson Sanchez's............Imagine 2 Davinson Sanchez's........
Lads we'll need to keep it simple for Sucky. He's having trouble following this stuff. I mean who else would post a table to wum us and end up being ridiculed because of it. Sturridge £150k. ****ing hilarious.Wake me up when the net spend spiel is over![]()
Lads we'll need to keep it simple for Sucky. He's having trouble following this stuff. I mean who else would post a table to wum us and end up being ridiculed because of it. Sturridge £150k. ****ing hilarious.
You are just confirming my point, you pay pennies in comparison to the big clubs and because of that you can't expect to hold on to the likes of Kane.Lads we'll need to keep it simple for Sucky. He's having trouble following this stuff. I mean who else would post a table to wum us and end up being ridiculed because of it. Sturridge £150k. ****ing hilarious.
The important part of that post is the bit where you mentioned being above you in the league. As that's what counts rather than how skint/tightfisted spurs are.As FSGs last rant would say :
The Poool are having to pay Coutinho and Sturridge
the ADDITIONAL total of Kanes' wages just to be
above Spurs in the PL.
The important part of that post is the bit where you mentioned being above you in the league. As that's what counts rather than how skint/tightfisted spurs are.
You are just confirming my point, you pay pennies in comparison to the big clubs and because of that you can't expect to hold on to the likes of Kane.
So thanks