I will never get over Rafa, he shown the world how to sell 2 or 3 good players and buy 7 or 8 **** players with the proceeds. Rafa, the net spend king
Seriously, City were reported to be interested in VvD but balked at the price, they would probably have bought him for around £60m last year (I think we might have also) but, coming off a serious injury he has shown nothing like his previous league form (not surprising since he obviously wasn't happy at his club) but more worrying, he has been just as bad at international level. It pays to make sure a player is over a serious injury before adding £15m to his valuation.
please log in to view this image 8 out of the last 10 years we've spent **** all, finished above you and built a new stadium.
Talk about feeding the world! Keep throwing them the hay,owners!!!! p.s.What is minimum wage for ordinary people????
How much are City and United charging to watch their games for Lord's sake?.....and where are the wages coming from to pay those stupid wages? p.s. How much are they charging fans to get out?
Sucky desperate for a late night pounding. Which he duly received. Where is/was FSGs last rant when a fellow Mouser was in need ??
£75m is crazy money for a Dutch lesbian, even in today`s massively inflated market, they could have spent the Coutinho money more wisely in my opinion.
As Brenton would say ... When you have spent over 70m on a CB, you have got to be : 1. Challenging for the title 2. Finishing above Spurs
Lads we'll need to keep it simple for Sucky. He's having trouble following this stuff. I mean who else would post a table to wum us and end up being ridiculed because of it. Sturridge £150k. ****ing hilarious.
As FSGs last rant would say : The Poool are having to pay Coutinho and Sturridge the ADDITIONAL total of Kanes' wages just to be above Spurs in the PL.
You are just confirming my point, you pay pennies in comparison to the big clubs and because of that you can't expect to hold on to the likes of Kane. So thanks
The important part of that post is the bit where you mentioned being above you in the league. As that's what counts rather than how skint/tightfisted spurs are. By all means pay less than us, if that means you not being competitive I support that mantra fully
The important of that post is the bit where the Poool finish below Spurs in the PL for 7 of the past 8 seasons on a wage bill that has ranged from 33-60% more. As that's what counts rather than how thick the Poool are in their player wage negotiations.
please log in to view this image Given your persistent failure to comprehend, subtlety will have to be put to one side...... NEXT SEASON WE START TO EARN MORE THAN YOU.
