Well, one step forward and two steps back. Not a surprise we lost, that is what we do at Boro, but really Nigel shouldn't have gone to a back 3, even though injuries forced his hand a bit, because it sounds as if the defence hadn't a clue what they were doing. Maybe should have tried one of the U23's wide players to give the width, rather than change the whole system.
Big game Friday now, if we don't get the win against the Blunts then we are really in the ****e. It's clear Ehab rhetoric now is to highlight the possibility of a protest, as then in his own mind and in the mind of some City fans, the situation will be blamed on the fans if we go down.
Get the feeling Ehab quite likes the thought of a protest, then he can tell Dad and the outside world, not his fault it's the fans. [HASHTAG]#deluded[/HASHTAG]
Defence was shocking, John. Not sure what is happening in training, but confidence seems shot.
I thought that protests became an option for them after the stress balls. Everyone jumped on the Queen visit but that was a red-herring; they saw that if they publicly asked for them to stop they gave themselves a moral edge - they also knew that with a few tweaks elsewhere in the supporter relationship they could indirectly incite more protest, but not be the cause (in their eyes and the very many uninformed out there). I've had no doubt, for some time now, that protests are playing their game, not ours.