In other news, Michael Johnston, the Kilmarnock chairman, has disgraced himself:
You must log in or register to see images
Commercial benefits outweigh sporting integrity. Say it slowly, over and over again if you have to, so that you might fully understand what's being said here.
Is this really what weâve come to in the Scottish game? Can you see why it might be a problem?
Briefly, here are some reasons that fat people might put forward to support such an immorality:
Michael Johnston is merely being realistic.
Michael Johnston is looking out for the best interests of his club.
Michael Johnston is looking out for the best interests of all SPL clubs.
Once you allow any of these reasons to pass through your system unchallenged, youâve fallen straight through the moral trapdoor and will land sharply on top of the ethically wretched Michael Johnston and any other SPL chairmen with such a viciously disfigured worldview. You deserve the company youâll be keeping.
"Member clubs are mindful of a sporting integrity aspectâ¦.."
Sporting integrity is not an âaspectâ of sport, an optional, structurally dispensable luxury, itâs the be all and end all â otherwise whatâs the point?
The commercial benefits of deliberately throwing a match for £500,000, say, would doubtless outweigh any benefits of adhering to the sporting integrity we may rightly expect (and demand) of our SPL teams.
And if youâre minded to bleat about this analogy stretching things too far, then youâve very probably failed to clearly think through and fully understand the underlying implication of Michael Johnstonâs words.
If we momentarily allow for the (slyly manipulative and bullying) threat that other teams in Scotland face a certain financial meltdown should Rangers drop out of the top league and that everything ought to be done, therefore, to stop this from happening, must we also then accept the fact that Rangers will never face the prospect of relegation? If not, why not? Whatâs the difference?
If these dire financial predictions are true, it seems reasonable to ask how on earth Scottish football got itself into such a mess that the fate of one club might so heavily impinge on the fate of all the others. And if the fate of these clubs is so heavily reliant on playing Rangers two times a season, then it might also be fair to say that these clubs probably donât deserve to survive â and Iâm entirely comfortable including Aberdeen in this observation.
Moderately alert observers may be forgiven for wondering, of course, how all of those clubs relegated from the SPL since its inception â and all of those clubs who have never been anywhere near the top league - have managed to survive the triple catastrophe of no Rangers, no Celtic and no TV deal. But thatâs by the by.
There is a terrible scandal surrounding Rangers at the moment, itâs true, but the greater scandal may reveal itself in the abject, supine, undiluted immorality of those SPL chairmen and administrators who may be about to do the unthinkable. This might be a game-changer, indelibly soiling the already diminished reputation of Scottish football.
(And see those people that youâre crawling to, Mr Johnston? They wonât admire you, not deep down, theyâll merely think that youâre weak. And theyâd be right.)
