Messi is a great but he is not so good that he can cover the mistakes of managers. In the world cup he was dropping into the midfield far too deep to get the ball because Argentina could not get the ball to him in dangerous areas. Argentina need to build a midfield, also develop some half decent full backs. Because if your full backs are **** going forward then the other team can put more effort into actually stopping Messi.
I think Messi playing for Argentina is a perfect example of how football is a team game. Take even a great player like Messi out of a team, and a system, he fits into, and you don't have anything like the same player. It is the same thing when we look at players we should buy at Arsenal. You cant just look at a player and say, "He is obviously a far better player than...(current player)", because that other player may not be good at the sysetem we play, the position we need, or fit in our team.
It doesn't make them a bad player, it just means that they are not a good fit. We also can't go changing all the other players to accommodate one superstar. This is what Mark Hughes failed to do at City. He just bought every player he could, without figuring out which players would fit togther.
As far as the refereeing goes, I just think refs do favour the "best" players. I don't care what the sport is, the best players get the calls. In US sports Michael Jordan and Wayne Gretsky got all the breaks from the referees. I think that the same was true in the Barcelona games. The ref was so worried about us kicking them, or time wasting, he went too far the other way. I think in every ref's mind is the thought, "I want the best team to win". Sometimes, they should be thinking, "I want to be fair" instead.




