Matty Phillips

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
P

poolie_mackem

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2011
3,302
29
48
Hartlepool
Just seen this on SMB...

Today, 11:41 AM * #1
discoquinn
Full Back
*

*
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: washington
Matt Phillips.......
Very close to signing. Not sure of fee, talks are ongoing apparently and deal is nearly done.

Be good acquisition IMO.

Source: Friend of Carlton Fairweather.
*


Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=718781#ixzz22IrGPO5Z




Good signing to provide competition to Jimmy Mc for the left wing spot IMO, can also play on the other side mind.
 
connor wigham said:
pardon?? i dont read the SMB actually if thats what you mean?? but i think this discoquinn could have got Carlton Fairweather (who i had to wikipedia) into alot of trouble
Click to expand...

You are a touchy fella, a guilt complex?

I was actually thinking more along the lines of your second line,,,i'e someone could be in trouble.............

some sensitive souls around here.
 
There's a few of these so called agents or friends of agents on Twitter, I'm still debating wether its guess work or just rehashed paper talk. There's never a new name but names already in the press. Fletcher is constantly mentioned but also always in the paper. I still deciding. A bit naive like that.
 
commachio said:
You are a touchy fella, a guilt complex?

I was actually thinking more along the lines of your second line,,,i'e someone could be in trouble.............

some sensitive souls around here.
Click to expand...

niether just you said i read the SMB... and im saying i dont <laugh> and then i was expalining why i said i didnt
 
connor wigham said:
niether just you said i read the SMB... and im saying i dont <laugh> and then i was expalining why i said i didnt
Click to expand...

Lost in translation here......

You say you don't read smb, nowt wrong with that, i do read it.

Then, if i'm correct in my thinking, you were justifying it by reading wikipedia?







if i am correct forgive my big:headbang: as i was once allowed on that site, but unfortunately they took exception to the time when i changed it to state that Shearer was an illiegitimate child.

If i'm wrong i apologise.
 
commachio said:
Lost in translation here......

You say you don't read smb, nowt wrong with that, i do read it.

Then, if i'm correct in my thinking, you were justifying it by reading wikipedia?.
Click to expand...

I made a comment about the thread...and you came back saying i read the SMB too...tut tut (which made me think i had done somthnig wrong?) and so i just said i dont read the SMB and as a side comment said i didnt even know who this "source" was
 
have had a chuckle over this.

Every ITK post i have ever seen on the whole net (not just here) has people asking for a source or they wont believe it, its bullshit etc etc.

This guy names his source to look on the level (he may have just plucked the name off the site tbh) and people are coming down on him like a ton of bricks, damned if they do and damned if they dont.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back