She will be paid by the production company that produces the ApprenticeIs Karen Brady a BBC employee? She can do what she wants in her own time. As Lineker should be able to do if he wants to donate to the Labour Party.
And to go all the way back to my first post in here which was really all that was needed, but for those hard of understanding..
Brady is not a paid worker for the BBCShe appears on a programme. She, like Lineker is not a BBC employee.
You mean the hard of understanding like you who said I claimed to be privy to Lineker's contract despite me saying I didnt know what was in Lineker's contract.
I also mentioned Chelsea would be scoring goals today and you tried to ridicule me for that: Leicester 1 Chelsea 3
I watched MOTD
there wasnt mention of the squads which would have been nice
the show didnt need to be so short
I would rather watch a show just showing football than have people thinking they dont have to follow the rules and getting paid a ridiculous amount
It will be good for the BBC to reduce the costs of showing football
Lineker will get other work and tweet as much as he wants
I think the other workers will have a lot more difficulty
Very similar to Scargill and the miners
So I was right about Chelsea's goals despite you making out I didnt have a clueWow I didn't predict Chelsea's goals, you really got me there. Go back and look at their goals output previously and the penny might drop about the reason for my comment.
And as usual you've missed the point about Lineker's contract. All I ever asked was if you knew what was in it as you were commenting as if you did. You admitting you didn't was kind of the reason I asked the question.
As the tweet I posted above indicates, freelance contracts with the BBC aren't held to the same impartiality standards unless, it seems, it's of a particular political persuasion.
So I was right about Chelsea's goals despite you making out I didnt have a clue
You said: "You admitting you didn't was kind of the reason I asked the question."
I said: “I dont know what is in his contract” see #96
You said: “And neither are you so stop claiming to be.” [HASHTAG]#110[/HASHTAG]
So you said I claimed to know what was in his contract AFTER I said I didnt know what's in his contract
You are rubbish at this
BBC DG = Tim Davie - explained the position after I said I didnt know what was in his contractWhat rules? You keep saying things like this despite admitting you don't know what rules are in Lineker's contract. Make up your mind!![]()
I didnt discuss their scoring history over the last 10 or so gamesYes, you didn't have a clue about their scoring history over the last 10 or so games. You were right about a game that hadn't been played yet, amazing.
You're very boring at this. Time for bed for you I'd say.
Syd's results forecasts should be banned from all social media to not enable betting companies an easy winLeicester 1-3 Chelsea
It gets worse for Gary
Syd called that one![]()
Maybe it's a protest because Lineker wasnt on MOTD?There was a fire incident at Royal Hotel tonight, people have legitimate concerns and were not all Tory voters.
https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/new...Sp5Y1QZhT7d7SMEqg20-qMV6rhjeA8UN75ORKpOen6NSY