Match Day Thread Manchester United FC v Sunderland AFC - Saturday 4th October 2025 - KO 15:00

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Your Prediction:


  • Total voters
    101
  • Poll closed .
No contact but he stopped Hume playing the ball? No penalty for me but dunno about the rules for that?
 
Not a chance we were getting a pen with the luck we are having today. Best team are winning but Christ every loose ball man.

Need a tactical masterclass here from RLB. Think we have r played better with a back 5 mind
 
  • Like
Reactions: clockstander
He kicked Hume. Made no contact with the ball. I disagree massively. Swung his leg, missed the ball, played the man (then the ball hit him after hitting Hume). ANYWHERE else on the field that’s a foul. Why not there?

I know mate, I said it then doubted myself! Easier not to give it though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
Surely a high foot kicking underneath an armpit is a foul, yes he never kicked him in the head but still stopped him getting to the ball hitting him chest high under arm

His foot was head height and he knew where Hume was, that was always called 'foot up' when I played ...

... does that no longer exist.
 
He kicked Hume. Made no contact with the ball. I disagree massively. Swung his leg, missed the ball, played the man (then the ball hit him after hitting Hume). ANYWHERE else on the field that’s a foul. Why not there?
I thought he made contact with Hume, just not in the face. Think I missed the rule change where its only a foul when you get a kick in the face. Also, was it not high feet?