S
Super G Ted'inho
Guest
right back from meeting.
IBWT:
says he is forced to vote and cannot change. He is also ineffect says he's been leaned on which in my view is actually against the rules a bit.
swarbs i think you can't assume all hat will occur but i guess assuming worst case aint bad either seeing we don't know.
Possible theories:
1. The heavy is indeed leaning on IBWT and said vote sky.
2. IBWT is mafia and is doing this to be sneaky.
3. we have all misinterpreted the comment and some other rule is in place.
examining these:
HEAVY leaned on IBWT with vote:
1. PM would come FROM ASTRO at 10am after paper with vote to give. (please read the rules, there's no point in having a heavy thats revealed day one. astro does pm in my view)
2. IBWT voted after 10 am.
IBWT is mafia...
1.game 2 and 3 performances suggest just such a move by IBWT to confuse everyone and give a reason to sit back.
2. by being public in being leaned on IBWT gives perfect cover to himself. i.e. "i am an innocent cos mafia leaned on me."
what other rule?
1. only heavy role specifically calls out a reason as ibwt intimated.
thus we can say that this vote is suspicious but does tell me either or not IBWT is mafia or innocent. Sorry biscan but you have been too sneaky before for me to just assume anything right now. Your vote puts you out there which you might have thought to do as you sat back last games. Equally you could still be innocent
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out as the first crumb on offer. I also hope that guys don't fail to remember it later in game (for good or bad) in the last game on day 2 we ended up restating day 1 all over and not using the info.
I agree with this but that doesn't apply to a Mafia member of course
), he will know he can't say he's been leaned on and he will know his comments have made it pretty clear. I guess if he is innocent than its a judgement call for Astro.
Of course I am.
