LUST Statement

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
OneLeeds said:
Sorry to butt into your argument lads but can't you distrust Bates and LUST together, or, if you don't trust Lust you're automatically sucking Bates off, cos i thought every Leeds fan knows the old bastard is screwing us over
Click to expand...

I just get annoyed seeing some members on here getting ganged up on by the pro LUST crew. Anyone who DARE question LUST get shot down as Bates supporters and everything questioned gets the generic answer of 'confidentiallity clauses' (I am not pointing fingers in this thread). Blatant falseness or questionable stuff that LUST release gets overlooked or ignored.

Like Liw I have posed my fair share of questions directly to LUST and it has been overlooked or answered with another question. I respect those that fully support LUST but I don't agree with them, I wonder to myself why they follow LUST in what comes across as in a blinded fashion and devoted loyalty totally ignoring some of the questionable stuff they release? I scratch my head and put it down to the hatred for Bates.
 
ristac said:
I just get annoyed seeing some members on here getting ganged up on by the pro LUST crew. Anyone who DARE question LUST get shot down as Bates supporters and everything questioned gets the generic answer of 'confidentiallity clauses' (I am not pointing fingers in this thread). Blatant falseness or questionable stuff that LUST release gets overlooked or ignored.
Click to expand...

Completely agree, this is why I tend not to get involved in these discussions <ok>
And if we don't agree with LUST's methods we're not proper supporters <doh>
 
Simon21-LUFC said:
Why exactly would he need to say it publicly? (unless, of course, he was asked)
Click to expand...

Because quite a few believe that he is mugging you guys off and he is in it for the glory of a seat on the board.

Anyway i am disgusted that your cronies saw fit to delete a thread just because you had made yourself look a tit. If they did that everytime you have made yourself look a tit over gary and your need to be his no1 fan the place would have hardly aany threads at all,


LIW was innocent.
 
kiwi said:
Completely agree, this is why I tend not to get involved in these discussions <ok>
And if we don't agree with LUST's methods we're not proper supporters <doh>
Click to expand...

Got to agree with you there Kiwi, although i don't know much about LUSTS methods hence i don't comment on them, but i find it a bit amusing that if you don't trust them you're a Bates puppet
i saw Gary Cooper on Calender the other week he spoke for ages but didn't say anything.

but **** it, i'm keeping outta this one<ok>
 
can someone put the chip van out? said:
Because quite a few believe that he is mugging you guys off and he is in it for the glory of a seat on the board.

Anyway i am disgusted that your cronies saw fit to delete a thread just because you had made yourself look a tit. If they did that everytime you have made yourself look a tit over gary and your need to be his no1 fan the place would have hardly aany threads at all,


LIW was innocent.
Click to expand...

I had nothing to do with it, and in what world do I have "cronies"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back