Luongo

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Luongo
Watford_R said:
When he doesn't play we don't win- simple as that. Obviously we don't always win when he does play, but we seem hopeless without him.

1.7 points per game when he starts

0.6 without him.

But some don't rate him still.
Click to expand...

What are Henry's stats I wonder? I wasn't at the game yesterday, nor have I watched any highlights, but I'm confident he was as **** as ever.
 
Luongo ws badly missed yesterday.

Mind you, Henry was certainly better than Cousins & if anything we were even worse after sandro appeared!

At half time we should have been in front (based on performance) but were absymal after the break.
 
terryb said:
Luongo ws badly missed yesterday.

Mind you, Henry was certainly better than Cousins & if anything we were even worse after sandro appeared!

At half time we should have been in front (based on performance) but were absymal after the break.
Click to expand...
Sandro? Our best in midfield and one of the 4 best player ratings according to WLS. And he hit the post which looked to be the closest we came to scoring.
 
QPR Oslo said:
Sandro? Our best in midfield and one of the 4 best player ratings according to WLS. And he hit the post which looked to be the closest we came to scoring.
Click to expand...
Yes, he hit the post from a corner in about the 88th minute.

IMO we were an even worse team after Sandro entered the pitch than beforehand. His passing, & tackling were almost non-existent & his need to be treated for injury following a perfectly timed tackle was embarrasing.

Yes, Henry passed the ball better than Sandro did. Yes, Henry tackled better than sandro did.

And No, Henry was not very good. My rating for the midfield yesterday would have been Henry 5.5, Sandro 4.5, Cousins 4.0

Perch & Bidwell would also not have been above 4.0
 
terryb said:
Yes, he hit the post from a corner in about the 88th minute.

IMO we were an even worse team after Sandro entered the pitch than beforehand. His passing, & tackling were almost non-existent & his need to be treated for injury following a perfectly timed tackle was embarrasing.

Yes, Henry passed the ball better than Sandro did. Yes, Henry tackled better than sandro did.

And No, Henry was not very good. My rating for the midfield yesterday would have been Henry 5.5, Sandro 4.5, Cousins 4.0

Perch & Bidwell would also not have been above 4.0
Click to expand...

I've only seen some highlights so I can hardly judge. but it's funny how opinions differ. Bidwell and Sandro both got 7 on WLS you give them 4! Washington and Hall both got 7 too.

Had to laugh at Olly claiming the 2nd goal wasn't the Keeper's fault but defenders not giving him an angle! They needed to be Olympic sprinters on dope to do that in that situation.
 
This is quite a good article from todays Guardian.

Hasselbaink’s replacement, Ian Holloway, has thus far lived up to his public reputation (“You never have a boring day at QPR now...”) but is also encouraging Luongo to continue along a similar path. “He wants me on the ball as much as possible, to do what I do best. He just wants me to express myself, and I’m not saying previous managers didn’t do that, but their styles needed a little bit more discipline from me, more of a ‘team’ job. He’s allowing me quite a lot of freedom in middle.”

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...he-socceroos-star-doing-it-for-himself-at-qpr
 
QPR999 said:
This is quite a good article from todays Guardian.

Hasselbaink’s replacement, Ian Holloway, has thus far lived up to his public reputation (“You never have a boring day at QPR now...”) but is also encouraging Luongo to continue along a similar path. “He wants me on the ball as much as possible, to do what I do best. He just wants me to express myself, and I’m not saying previous managers didn’t do that, but their styles needed a little bit more discipline from me, more of a ‘team’ job. He’s allowing me quite a lot of freedom in middle.”

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...he-socceroos-star-doing-it-for-himself-at-qpr
Click to expand...

Maybe it would do Chery good to sit out a game or two and give Luongo that role.
 
Watford_R said:
Maybe it would do Chery good to sit out a game or two and give Luongo that role.
Click to expand...
They need to play together in midfield. That's what Ollie needs to to, and figure out. Both of them need to be let free to play off of each other and roam that area behind the strikers to find space and to direct passes
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
Watford_R said:
When he doesn't play we don't win- simple as that. Obviously we don't always win when he does play, but we seem hopeless without him.

1.7 points per game when he starts

0.6 without him.

But some don't rate him still.
Click to expand...


Fit to play tonight Watford.
 
You can have the pleasure of watching it on Sky Stan! Thursday night special. All part of Sky's wonderful week of live games every day!

While you do, think of us poor fools that are standimg at the back of the Upper Loft feezing our ***** off!

How many times will Roller tell me all about how he met Ollie?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tramore Ranger and sb_73
I do hope that we all join the Wolves fans (and complete respect to any of them at the game) with their rendition of "Saturday at 3.00pm".

Hopefully when all is quiet in the ground & the broadcasters can't hide it!

They were brilliant in putting their case forward last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tramore Ranger
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back