It's probably a good job no one's doing that then.
Let’s make this simple:
You criticize people-1 for criticizing other people; let’s call them people-2.
Now we know that there were about 8,000 – 10,000 regular (ish) supporters NOT at the FA Cup match.
We know none of them could be termed ‘Plastics’ (people-2), as we are not in the PL.
We don’t know how many of people-1 stayed away because of a second-string team.
We don’t know how many of the unknown people-1 (who stayed away because of the 2nd string team) actually makes a habit of criticising people-2 (the Plastics).
But, apparently these unknown people-1 criticisers of people-2 are a problem as they are disloyal!
Still with me?

What do we know?
This thread has had the largest number of posts for a long time – 124 and counting (non-sticky that is) – so well done for that! I can only claim 6 or 7 of them.
Having read them all in passing, I would have to conclude that most are from folk who turned away from the game for financial or other, non-team reasons.
Perhaps the Plastics (people-2) are too embarrassed to say anything.
The Point.
Is there one?

See, I said it was simple!

