Lennon's Contract sham

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You can smell the fear from the Rangers fans as they preapre to face the new season with a 50 year old rookie and a Celtic reject coach with only Gordon Smith up in the stand to turn to. Keep control of your bowels William and go easy on Wilma <ok>
 
Here is the reason Lennon only got a years rolling contract, He is a bit of a mad man in the dug out, The club can not calm him down, neither can the refs or officials at the SFA.

Also the mad Irish ****er is always 2 defeats away from a mental house and smearing himself in ****e!!
 
a 1 year rolling contract is no bad for someone that was supposedly getting sacked after the Scottish cup :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
preston / blackpool. you posted the same p1sh on ja606. i am not sure why i am bothering but i will try and get through.

how long is sally's contract?

how long pep guardiola?

How long Jose Mouriniho?


O'Neill, Strachan were both on rolling contracts. its not a big deal it work well for the club

Lennon has been rewarded by doubling his wage.

you keep trying to put a negative spin on it
 
MrT said:
It's not the contract that will show how much the board trust lennon, it's how much cash they'll allow him to spend on players.
Click to expand...

So it starts off about Lennon's contract and when that gets shot down in flames you try changing it to how much money he'll have to spend.

What a pisswank <doh>
 
must admit i was suprised by how many players the board let him sign. i thought that after the £ mowbray spent they wouldnt back lennon to the same degree. he's done well transfer fee wise but with the no. of players he's brought in the wage bill must be massive. as for the contract its pretty common although i dont really see the point in a managr wanting one unless he's thinking of chucking it or he's keeping his options open for a move elsewhere.
 
PrestonBear said:
Can TGFITW explain to me why the saviour Neil Lennon who gave the club its greatest season(failure) for 4 years is only getting a 12 month rolling contract??
I mean I thought this guy was moses and could do no wrong so why the complete lack of faith in him by giving him a sham of a contract?
For example Alex McCleish 3 year contract to Villa.
Malky Mackay 2 year contract
Ally McCoist 3 year contract
I'll tell you why he isn't a good manager and the board knows this hence they have no faith in him by giving him a rolling contract meaning Lennon won't get compensation when they sack him which they will as he chokes in all big games 1 trophy out of 5 = Celtics celebrated failure
Click to expand...

You tell us why it's any concern of yours first you cretin.
 
What a pisswank
Click to expand...

What you talking about ya slevering ****?

I said celtic got burnt with a long term contract with mowbray. They were never going to repeat that with Lennon so their faith will be shown if they push the boat out with whatever funds he gets.

Dullard.
 
MrT said:
What you talking about ya slevering ****?

I said celtic got burnt with a long term contract with mowbray. They were never going to repeat that with Lennon so their faith will be shown if they push the boat out with whatever funds he gets.

Dullard.
Click to expand...


No, you started going on about how much money Lennon would have to spend you ****ing brainless bag of diarrhoea.
 
Where did I get shot down?

The point of the OP was to show the lack of faith in Lennon by the board with the 12 month rolling contract. I disagree. The faith of the Celtic board will be shown in the money they trust him with. The points are related in terms of disagreeing with the original post.

I don't believe that is difficult to understand so why are you making such hard work of it? ****ing simpleton.
 
No, your fellow Hun Preston got his arse handed to him for trying to score points about the contract length so you tried a different tact and failed spectacularly.

As one would expect from such a pronk.
 
You really are mentally deficient.

As you seem to like pulling people up for spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, you believe that I tried to change 'tack' and not tact. Tack is a nautical term. I thought with your experience with the sailors at Leith Docks you would have been aware of this.

Semen/seaman - all one to you.
 
MrT said:
You really are mentally deficient.

As you seem to like pulling people up for spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, you believe that I tried to change 'tack' and not tact. Tack is a nautical term. I thought with your experience with the sailors at Leith Docks you would have been aware of this.

Semen/seaman - all one to you.
Click to expand...

?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back