leave her there
- Thread starter Rorschach
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
And here you are advocating it.
Well she's taken a lot of organs..The dirty little spunk trumpet.
People don't just **** of and deceive even their own families to go and suck a lot of cock in a foreign warzone.
These little tramps did,
Even if you’re someone who sympathises with her (I’m not), the simple fact is that allowing her back into the UK will carry the risk of her committing a terrorist attack, regardless of assessments, assurances and precautions that’d be made. I don’t want that risk.
Young or not, she turned her back on her friends, family and most importantly her country. So quite frankly, **** her, this isn’t something you can say “ok, here’s a second chance” too.
Young or not, she turned her back on her friends, family and most importantly her country. So quite frankly, **** her, this isn’t something you can say “ok, here’s a second chance” too.
Which part of 'she turned her back on the country' don't you get?
Where does the law actually stand on this ? If she's committed a crime, then it's something like aiding and abetting terrorism. But if she's done that on foreign soil, then can she be charged with it under UK law ?
Is she any different to any freedom fighter?
They go to kill, she went to make terrorist babies
There is no evidence supporting the theory of child abuse or grooming at this stage. I'm not dismissing the possibility but no evidence has come to light in the 4 years since they left.
They first came to the authorities attention in December 2014. I believe the three girls disappeared in February 2015. All three girls attended Bethnal Green Academy.
So what is the importance in this, well it was December 2014, that the three girls were interviewed after a friend of theirs (fourth girl) travelled to Syria. So if there was grooming, then surely the Academy with the loss of four pupils has to be brought into the spotlight, if indeed the earlier friend went to BGA. Although police were quick at highlighting at the time of their friends disappearance that there was NO evidence of radicalization.
However, the girl that now wants to return home, was in known contact with a Aqsa Mahmood before she left on that journey. The importance of Aqsa is that (fifth person) left for Syria in 2013 to marry an extremist. The teenager tweeted Mahmoon, two days before her own disappearance in early 2015, i believe eventually leaving on her sisters passport.
The main thing that seems to come to light in most of this is social media is being used as tool, depends how you want to link that into any so called grooming. Just in the small bubble of Shamima Begum alone, that is five young girls who felt the need at the time to leave the UK.
https://musliminstitute.org/freethi...s-if-you-are-considering-leaving-uk-join-isis
It should not go without note, that IS no longer control the swathes of land they once did back in 2014, they are now cornered down on the Iraqi border with limited time before they are completely wiped out. Shamima like many other people that travelled out to Syria, want to return home as they have been defeated on the battlefield. Again being callous i could say it's convenient to have a baby to support your cause on return.
Last edited:
I get it completely but I also recognise that she was a child who was exploited and think that even the smallest bit of intel should be extracted from her. That can’t be done if she’s in Syria or dead. I’m not saying bring her back and give her a penthouse flat in North London.
If (and that’s IF) she’s brought back she should go straight to prison.
I’d much rather she was just shot in the head and be done with, as all terrorists should.
Ultimately the country should just forget her. As she did us. Let the Syrian authorities do as they please with her, just as long as she doesn’t set foot on UK soil ever again I don’t really care.
The law says she can’t be made stateless as she’s not got dual nationality , so has to be allowed back into the U.K. if she arrives.
In terms of crimes committed she’d no doubt fall foul of some aspect of the 2006 Terrorism Act.
The average size of a jihadi cock?
She was there to comfort them with her legs open, and nothing more
As I've said I'm with fan on this. I think it's a child protection issue, she was a 15 year old girl groomed into joining a group that was essentially about sexual exploitation. People are saying, she made the choice to do it, but you could say the same about the teenage girls that willingly turn up at old nonces houses to be passed around for sex.
People now are like, she turned her back on us, and she's shown no remorse. She's been indoctrinated so it's understandable why she has those views. But at the end of the day she was a child and my view is that she needs help.
As it's my view view your whole post is bollox..
You've just said she was 15., old enough to breed then? .And her friend, and let's not forget her mate already out there bucking .
They skipped across borders, got on planes etc...
They knew what they were doing..
Couldn't really give a **** whether you think it's bollocks to be honest mate. In the eyes of the law she was a child, and clearly one who was vulnerable enough to be groomed by radical Islamists. Doesn't matter if she was biologically old enough to have children, she was a child herself.
And now she's not...Now she wants return with some bastard child, probably not knowing the father, but you can bet he was no good. And she's trying to find an easy way out..
She didn't bother trying to do this with the first 2..But now as @brb pointed out ISIS are ****ed..She's trying to make a run for it..
The dirty little skank..
- Status