leave her there
- Thread starter Rorschach
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Who, @DUNCAN DONUTS ?
Only a matter of time mate. And when he does, he’ll be the most hard core fundamentalist Muslim in Norfolk.
D
Deleted.......
Guest
Nah - the nutter who shot all those country and Western fans in the US.
Last edited by a moderator:
The lefty ****ers bizzare Islam fetish
1. Not all Muslims are terrorists
2. Not all Isis members are terrorists
3. Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam
4. The Isis Islamic terrorists that rape and butcher infidels for kicks only do it because white men bombed Japan
5. Any criticism of Isis Islamic terrorists that rape and butcher infidels for kicks is Islamaphobic and nothing to do with Islam or their actions it's because of unconscious white bias.
1. Not all Muslims are terrorists
2. Not all Isis members are terrorists
3. Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam
4. The Isis Islamic terrorists that rape and butcher infidels for kicks only do it because white men bombed Japan
5. Any criticism of Isis Islamic terrorists that rape and butcher infidels for kicks is Islamaphobic and nothing to do with Islam or their actions it's because of unconscious white bias.
Those Americans don't count though bro - as per Duncs new rules.
Terror only counts if it happens outside of the great US of fooking A. 9/11 was not terrorist related either according to the amazing same ideology of thought.
Unless Duncs does an addendum, to count Muslims and just ignore all other terror related offences.
Actually i'm quite confused now, maybe that's why Trump is building a wall, to aid Duncs in segregating all American atrocities from those of muslims and people of colour.
God bless Harry Truman and George Bush x
Actually out of interest how many people died at the hands of those two white men, well Hiroshima and Nagasaki had to be at least 200,000. Probably 460,000 in Bush's reign.
Not bad 660,000 dead people. All legally of course.
The thing is you give away your sweeping prejudice against all Muslims and brown people when you refer to someone as in bred purely because she’s a brown Muslim.The lefty ****ers bizzare Islam fetish
1. Not all Muslims are terrorists
2. Not all Isis members are terrorists
3. Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam
4. The Isis Islamic terrorists that rape and butcher infidels for kicks only do it because white men bombed Japan
5. Any criticism of Isis Islamic terrorists that rape and butcher infidels for kicks is Islamaphobic and nothing to do with Islam or their actions it's because of unconscious white bias.
Only a matter of time before you have a stroke you unfunny fat ****.
Salaam to you too, you gibbering psycho
It doesn't offer any justification for letting the misguided angel back in either way.
Not purely because she's a brown Muslim but percentage wise marriage between first cousins is extremely common between South East Asians .
I did actually tell you this already.
Ps [HASHTAG]#notall[/HASHTAG]
Seemingly whining on about that comment soothes the pain of the reality that she's unrepentant over her crimes associated with joining ISIS.
Ahhh, i see you want justification for letting her back...
A professor on terrorism or more so ISIS, so i would say he has more expertise than the like of you and me, claimed that they should all be let back to their relevant countries and need to be removed from Syria. By doing so, they would then be held account to the judiciary system and could also be questioned, in regards to their knowledge and as such any criminal activities they have carried out.
He actually found them more of a risk by leaving them in Syria, rather than bringing them home and holding them to full account of the law. He went on to make specific comments in regards to Begum...
Stating on several occasions she was only 15! Now i know that will butt hurt you, but he repeated, she was 15 and naive, his words not mine, also remembering she has a baby (a completely innocent baby). The professor also commented that her husband married her at the age of 15, again questioning moral judgement of the Dutch man.
But hey i guess your intelligence is greater than that of a man whose field and expertise is terrorism...or is it that people of colour and of the religion muslim, should over-ride the judgement of an expert on the matter.
- Status